User Tag List

Pagina 1 di 2 12 UltimaUltima
Risultati da 1 a 10 di 11
  1. #1
    email non funzionante
    Data Registrazione
    28 Mar 2002
    Località
    estremo occidente
    Messaggi
    15,083
     Likes dati
    0
     Like avuti
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito faraoni biondi: presenze nordiche nell'antico egitto?

    Were the Pharaohs Blond?

    Author: Phillip Bonner

    Filed: 11/29/2002, 224 AM
    Source: The Barnes Review, 1(14) 1995 , pp. 3-10.

    To those with only the most casual knowledge of ancient Egyptian civilization, the above question will no doubt appear ludicrous. But by delving deeper into questions and known facts relating to mankind's develop ment, the answer is affirmative to a considerable extent.




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    In 1939 professor Carleton Coon of Harvard University wrote a book called The Races of Europe. It runs to over 700 pages and is filled with pictures, charts, maps, diagrams, and scholarly footnotes.

    In this book, Prof. Coon made a startling statement: "Queen Hetep-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops, the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin is white. This is the earliest known evidence of blondism in the world."[1]

    Where could the Egyptian blonds have come from? There are a number of possibilities: Libyans, megalith-builders, Sumerians, and people from the Cau casus Mountain-Ukraine area.

    The ancient Libyans extended from the Canary Islands across North Africa to the Delta of the Nile. The western third of the Nile Delta was occupied by Libyans during the early years of recorded civilization.[2] Is it possible that a white Caucasian people may have composed the bulk of the ruling class in ancient Egypt?

    Who were the Libyans and where did they come from? Prof. Coon tells us that during the Upper Paleolithic Era (30,000-5,000 B.C.) Eur ope and North west Africa were occupied by a people called the Cro-Mag nons.[3] These were perhaps the most physically advanced and handsome race the world has ever seen. Their skulls were larger and farther evolved from the apes than those of any modern race of men. In view of the fact that the modern distribution of Cro-Magnon features is most frequent in the same areas where red hair is most common, it is probable that many Cro-Magnons had red hair.

    Today Cro-Magnon features are most frequently found in Norway, Ireland, and the Rif of Morocco.[4] The last-named region is occupied by descendants of the ancient Libyans. Coon tells us that in prehistoric times a group of Cro-Mag nons called the Afalou men occupied North Africa and that the Libyans were descended from them.[5] The modern Berbers are the remnants of the ancient Libyans. Coon tells us that many ancient Cro-Magnon skulls from Den mark and Sweden are identical to skulls from Afalou bou Rummel, in Algeria.[6] Braid wood says "Cro-Magnon people were tall and big-boned, with large, long, and rugged heads. They must have been built like many present-day Scandi navians." [7]

    The Afalou men and Cro-Magnons had larger brains than modern men. Their skull volume (which scientists call "cranial capacity") was about 1,650 cubic centimeters.[8] The modern average world brain size is 1,326 cc.[9] Farmers who lived at Tushka, on the Nile, about 11,000 B.C., had an average cranial capacity of 1,452 cc.[10] This is almost identical to the brain size of modern northern Europeans, 1,453 cc.[11] Modern Cairo natives average only 1,302 cc.[12] But even this is more than the average of modern African blacks, 1,295 cc.[13]

    At the time of the Afalou men, Africa south of the Sahara was populated by Rhodesian Man, who averaged 1,225 cc.[14] Over the millennia, the influx of blacks from south of the Sahara has caused the population of Egypt to become darker, and their brains to become smaller.

    Ancient Egyptian paintings of Libyans depicted them as white, with blond hair, blue eyes and Nordic facial features.[15] The ancient Greek writer Scylax described the Libyans as blond.[16] Latin writers also described the Libyans as blond.[17] Many of the red-haired rulers of medieval Moslem Spain and North Africa were Berbers. Today, the ancient Libyan race still survives in remote parts of the Rif in Morocco and among the Kabyles of Algeria. Four percent of the Kabyles have red hair, compared with three percent of the people of Iceland and five percent of those in Ireland.[18]

    Coon tells us that " . . . a Riffian Nordic could be mistaken for an Irishman or an Englishman, less easily for a Scandi navian."[19] Recent DNA testing bears this out. Berbers are more closely related to Englishmen than to any other people in either Africa or Europe.[20]


    Coon writes "In one tribe, the Beni Saïd, the bulk of the series is composed of the imgharem, or members of the tribal council which was in session on the day of measuring; the heads of this august group have the remarkable dimensions, for North Africa, of 197 mm. by 148 mm. by 131 mm. To equal these diameters one would need normally to go to western Norway, to Ireland, or to the United States Senate."[21]

    Professor Coon shows a photograph of "A very blond youth from the Senhajan tribe of Ktama, the most isolated spot in northern Morocco. Facially, he resembles a southern Swede . . . "[22]

    Coon shows another photograph of a Riffian and under it writes "In pigment, in measurements, and morphologically, this Riffian is as perfect a Nordic as one could find in modern Europe. Nordics are as ancient in North Africa as the Egyptian monuments of the Middle Kingdom, and perhaps older. They survive today mostly in the mountains of the Rif, but others are found in the Canary Islands and the Djurdjura and Aures mountains of Algeria."[23] He tells us that 84 percent of a tribe of Kabyles in Algeria have mixed or light eyes; only 16 percent brown.[24]

    As for the Shawia, he says: "The notable fact about the Shawia is that, in a metrical sense, they are identical with northwestern European Nordics. One could substitute the mean of the Shawia sample of Randall-Maciver and Wilkin for those of a characteristic eastern Norwegian province without serious discrepancy . . . The nasal profile shows Nordic tendencies; concave-convex forms like those common in England, are as frequent as straight . . . Against the prevailing brunetness of the Shawia stands a tradition that their ancestors were formerly much blonder, and that their brunet condition is due to mixture with outside Berber and Arab groups."[25]

    Sir Flinders Petrie, known as "the father of Egyptology," had this to say: "The physiognomy gives a decisive pronounced connection between prehistoric Egypt and ancient Libya, and thus anthropology supports the many evidences which archeology has given for a close connection between Egypt and Libya."[26]


    During the period just before the establishment of the First Dynasty 3100 B.C., Seth, King of Upper Egypt, and his brother Osiris were fighting for control of Egypt. Both were later made into gods. It is said of Seth "He was also associated with the Libyan desert and the Libyans . . . He is identified with Ash, the Libyan god. In the Old King dom he had some relation with Libya."[27] The great Egyptian historian Maspero says Seth "was red-haired and white-skinned, of violent, gloomy, and jealous temper. Secretly he aspired to the crown . . . "[28]

    Horus was the name of the Egyptian Sun god. The early pharaohs used the title "Horus," not Pharaoh. It is interesting to note in this connection that the ancient Russians also worshipped a sun god by the name of Horus. This may indicate that followers of Horus came from Russia.

    The ancient Egyptians made Seth the god of the underworld. Menes, the first pharaoh, who may have been of Libyan descent, carried on military operations against the Libyans in the western Nile Delta who were independent of the rest of Egypt.

    "Plutarch tells us that these Set people were men of red hair, and that may be a reference to some Libyan factions who are known for this trait."[29] Lepre continues: "The Set people, although primarily situated at their capital city of Shash otpe, were apparently scattered through out all of Egypt. Legends place them in the town of Sesesu in the Fayum, where the god Set was said to have been born; in the marshes of the Delta; and at a city called Avaris, also in the Delta. They also resided between Luxor and Aswan, specifically at El Kab and Esneh, and on the banks of the Nile in the Eleventh Province, but they eventually settled in great numbers at Ombos, where they erected a great temple to Set. Here can be found vast cemeteries dating to the period prior to Dynasty I."
    As the ruling class of Egypt declined, they were replaced by invaders. A monument discovered by M. Mariette says that blond Libyan invaders established themselves in Lower Egypt in the 7th Century B.C. and put Psammeticus in power as the new pharaoh. The 22nd Dynasty was founded by a Nubian family of Libyan descent. People with red hair were called "Set-people" and were used in human sacrifices. Their god Set (or Seth) was made into a devil.

    "Communities of Set people seem to have been scattered throughout Egypt, but their main capital was at Ombos, a short way up the river from This. They maintained their independence through much of Egypt's early history."[30] During the Second Dynasty (2890-2686 B.C.) the Set people revolted and briefly ruled over all of Egypt.
    John Romer, describing a Middle Kingdom (2040-1782 B.C.) papyrus, tells us "Followers of Seth, says Kenhirk hope shef's papyrus, were readily identifiable in society by their appearance and behavior. Commonly they had red faces and red hair, and they were violent and often lonely people who drank to excess."[31]
    Further evidence of Libyan influence is the fact that the ancient Egyptian language was very similar to Libyan.

    Around 2840 B.C. there was a rebellion of Set people centered around the town called Edfu. This is significant because Edfu is where some of the few megaliths found in Egypt are located. A very ancient and beautiful temple called the Osireion, which was built in the mega lithic style, is in nearby Abydos, where Pharaoh Perabsen was to actually convert to the Seth religion a few years later.

    What is a megalith? A megalith is a structure built with huge stones, like Stonehenge in England. Who were the megalith builders? They were people with a unified culture who loved sailing the sea and founding new colonies of megalith builders. Megaliths are found in southern Sweden, Denmark, Ireland, Brittany, Spain, the Balearic Islands, Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily and in North Africa. In other words, they are found all along the Atlantic coasts and the Mediterranean. Von Lichtenberg found a megalith at Edfu, in Egypt. Cromlechs and dolmens (two types of megaliths) were built at Maadi, near Cairo.[32]

    Scholars have long noted the similarities between the megalithic culture and that of the ancient Egypt ians. It was once thought that the megalith-builders were emigrants from Egypt.

    It is not widely known that there are structures like the pyramids in England and France. Silbury Hill, near Stone henge, looks at first glance like a natural hill. But on closer inspection one notices the perfect shape, somewhat like a pyramid. Excavations have yielded more surprises.[33] Blocks of chalk were used to build a seven-tiered ziggurat; then rubble was added to smooth the walls. Later vegetation grew on it. A ziggurat is a step pyramid, like the first pyramids of Egypt. The famous pyramid of Djoser was built as a ziggurat.

    One recent popular theory involved an Egyptian scientific expedition going to England and setting up an astronomical observatory at Stonehenge. When the leader died, a pyramid was supposedly built for him at Silbury Hill, twenty miles away.[34]

    Actually, it was built around 2750 B.C., long before any ziggurats or pyramids were built in Egypt or the Middle East.[35]
    Silbury Hill contains 250,000 cubic meters of chalk. It has been calculated that it took 18 million man-hours to build. It is the largest man-made mound in Europe.

    As recently as 1974 a very popular book calledThe Sphinx and the Megaliths was published expounding a similar point of view. This book points out that the megaliths and the pyramids were deliberately aligned to make complicated astronomical observations. It would have taken a knowledge of university-level mathematics to build either Stonehenge or the Great Pyramid at Giza. Furthermore, the systems of measurement had to have the same origin, since one megalithic yard was precisely equal to the square root of five Egyptian "remens." The square root of 5 (2.23607) was a very important number in Egyptian engineering.[36] The diagonal of a two-by-one remen rectangle is precisely one megalithic yard.

    It is also interesting that one of the most spectacular megalithic sites is at Carnac, in Brittany, and that spectacular Egyptian temples were built at Karnak, in Egypt. In England, earthen structures were made similar to Middle Eastern pyramids. "Silbury Hill was a complex of engineering involving advanced methods of construction similar to those used in the Egyptian pyramids . . . with such accuracy that the center of the topmost layer is within two-and-a-half inches of a vertical line drawn through the center of the base."[37]

    Let us hear what other authors have said about the Megaliths. "The Passage chamber tomb which is the primary and original 'megalithic' type in the West was characteristic in all the early centers of higher civilization. The rock-cut tomb of the Old Kingdom in Egypt and the excavated dromos tombs of Early and Middle Minoan Crete are obviously parallel in plan and function and the fact that many of the finest Iberian tombs were excavated in the ground is of great importance."[38]

    "Sophus Mueller has claimed that all the techniques and decorative elements employed in the finer wares of the Western megalithic cultures were developed at the eastern end of the Mediter ranean. In the Egyptian and Nubian wares of the Old Kingdom comb im prints, encrusted bands, triangles and diamonds, and the fine burnishing of black wares were fully developed and continued in use for long periods."[39] Mélida has also shown remarkable similarities between the rich ornament of the southwest Iberian beakers and that of Old Kingdom painted and encrusted wares in Egypt."[40]

    The following items found with megaliths resemble similar objects found in Egypt: twin-lobed stone pendants, flat schist plaques, trapezoidal flint arrow-heads and rare flint halberds, ivory sandals, bone and ivory combs, pottery in Spanish megaliths similar to Badarian pottery in Egypt and low carinated bowls which resemble the beautiful stone bowls of Late Predynastic Egypt and Early Minoan Crete. Carinated bowls were a leading tomb ware in Brittany.[41]

    As for Spanish megaliths, Mackie said "Nilotic prototypes have also been suggested for the schist plaques and croziers of the southwest. The tanged daggers and flat copper celts of Almeria and Algarve are of the same forms that were being made in Egypt, Troy and Cyprus in the early part of the 3rd millennium."[42]
    Wheeler remarked that the analogy between the chambered tombs of Wales and the Mastabas (ziggurats) of Egypt was "too close to be altogether accidental."[43]

    However, the theory that the megalith builders were Egyptians was shattered once and for all in the late 1960s. The new system of carbon dating reveals that the megaliths began before civilization had even started in Egypt. The first megaliths were built in Brittany (the northwestern tip of France) in the 5th millennium B.C.[44] From their home in Brittany, the megalith-builders sailed in all directions and founded colonies. Stonehenge I and Silbury Hill were built earlier than the Great Pyramid at Giza, which although the best pyramid, was also one of the first.

    The great pyramids were all built in a span of 100 years, around 2600 B.C. The pyramids built after this were smaller and of inferior design, and sometimes fell apart. Objects found in the megalithic tombs of Western Europe are now dated as older than corresponding objects found in Egypt and the Near East. This can only mean one thing-the megalith-builders sailed to Egypt and brought with them the technology that built the pyramids. Perhaps the mysterious Imhotep, the universal genius who designed the pyramids and brought many other technological improvements to Egypt, was of the megalith-builders.

    Khufu, or Cheops, the builder of the Great Pyramid, had a wife,[45] a daughter,[46] and a daughter-in-law[47] with reddish-blond hair. We know this because color portraits were painted in their tombs. The Pharaoh Chephren, who built a pyramid next to the Great Pyramid, had a wife with reddish-blond hair and blue eyes.[48] The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.[49] Could some of the pyramid-building pharaohs have married Megalithic women?

    We must not forget that many of the ancient Libyans were megalith builders. An interesting article on this subject was written by Faidherbe called "Megalithic Tombs and the Blonds of Libya."[50] Another article, by A.H. Sayce,[51] is very interesting, although his dates are wrong, according to more recent research.

    The following is a quotation from Sayce's article in the Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland: "On Egyptian monuments, which date back to the sixteenth century before our era, the Libyan tribes of this district are depicted as white. Their descendants are still to be found in the mountainous parts of the coast, those of Algeria being commonly known under the name of Kabyles. I saw a good deal of them last winter, and must confess to being greatly struck by their appearance.

    "I had known, of course, that they belonged to the white race and were characterized by blue eyes and light hair, but I was not prepared to find that their complexion was of that transparent whiteness which freckles readily and is supposed to mark the so-called red Kelt. They are dolichocephalic [long-headed], and as their skulls agree with those discovered in the pre-historic cromlechs of Rocknia [in Algeria] and other places it is plain that their distinctive features are not due, as was formerly supposed, to inter-mixture with the Vandals." Here we see modern redheads in North Africa living near ancient megaliths.

    "The cromlechs in which they buried their dead are quite as remarkable as their physical characteristics. Cromlechs of a similar shape are found extending through Spain and Western France from the northern part of the British Isles. Since dolichocephalic skulls occur in connection with them, while the physical characteristics of the modern Kabyle resemble so strikingly those of a particular portion of the modern Irish population, we seem driven to infer that the Kabyle and the 'red Kelt' are alike fragments of a race that once spread from Scotland and Ireland to the northern coast of Africa and interred its dead in chambers formed of five large blocks of stone." Again, it is just such a chamber that was found at Edfu, a leading settlement of the red-haired Set-people in Egypt.

    Professor Coon tells us that the megalithic people, in whatever country they might be found, were always characterized by a distinctive racial type which he calls the Megalithic Race. This race appears to be a hybrid between Nordic and Cro-Magnoid.[52]

    The people who built the pyramids were definitely seafarers. A huge boat was buried next to the Great Pyramid at Giza. The Norwegian anthropologist and explorer Thor Heyerdahl built an exact copy of it. He called it the Ra after the Egyptian sun god. It was so well built that he and his crew were able to sail across the Atlantic Ocean in it.

    Drawings of boats with cabins and square sails have been found on megaliths in Brittany, where the first megaliths were built around 4800 B.C. Similar drawings have been found on megaliths in Malta, an island in the middle of the Mediterranean which is closer to Egypt than it is to Brittany. Drawings of the same kind of boat have been found in Egypt that have been dated to the Predynastic period, before 3100 B.C.[53]

    Who ruled Egypt? What were the racial types of the ruling class of Ancient Egypt and their slaves? Even anti-Nordic physical anthropologists have admitted that blond hair was not uncommon in Ancient Egypt. For example, Edouard Naville said, "The views of the numerous experts who have studied Egyptian skulls are definitely conflicting. However, they are unanimous at one point. They all agree that the Egyptians were not Negroes, that they had long hair, generally black, but sometimes fair, and that prognathism [projected jaw] sometimes appeared."[54]

    Frédéric Falkenburger compiled and analyzed all known skull measurements from Ancient Egypt and calculated that 10 percent of them were purely Cro-Magnoid and 15 percent partly Cro-Magnoid. Fifteen percent were largely of the Megalithic race. Most of the rest were racially Mediterranean. There were also Negroids.[55]
    Professor Raymond A. Dart, famous for his discoveries of primate fossils in Africa, once did a mathematical analysis of the measurements of 2,861 Egyptian skulls.[56] He found 280, or 10 percent, were Nordic; 128, or five percent, were Armenoid. This is the "Jewish," "Leba nese" or "Near Eastern" type. He points out that many Egyptian skulls must be Nordic because they are ellipsoidal (oval), dolichocephalic (long-headed), hypsicephalic (high-headed) and macrocephalic (large-headed).

    The only race with all these traits is the Nordic. The bulk of the population was of the brown Mediterranean race, which differs from the Nordic in being orthocephalic (of moderate skull height) instead of high-headed, medium-headed instead of long-headed, and pentagonoid (shaped a bit like a pentagon when seen from above) instead of ellipsoidal.
    Dart traces four major Nordic invasions of Egypt, the first being the Bada rian of pre-dynastic times. Grad ually, the Nordics arrived less frequently, until a new invasion replenished them.

    Dart tells us that the Nordic race is "the Egyptian Pharaonic type." He describes the head of Rameses II, which he calls "pelagic ellipsoidal or Nordic" and says, "It is found in earlier times in Pepi I and other kings of Egypt." He doesn't mention it, but the mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair too.[57] Under a microscope his hair form is Nordic too. This pharaoh was once thought to be the contemporary of Moses.

    In 1993 a group of anthropologists did an exhaustive study of the racial make-up of the ancient Egyptians. Their article was entitled "Clines and Clusters vs 'Race': A Test in Ancient Egypt and the Case of a Death on the Nile," and appeared in the Yearbook of Physical Anthropology. Anthropologic measurements of 25 different groups of skeletons from around the world, from ancient to modern times, were statistically analyzed to see which groups were most similar to ancient Egyptians. In their own words, this is what the researchers concluded. "As a whole, they show ties with the European Neolithic, North Africa, modern Europe, and, more remotely, India, but not at all with sub-Saharan Africa, eastern Asia, Oceania or the New World." The group of skeletons which most closely resembled the ancient Egyptians was that from the French Neolithic.

    A British Museum publication has this to say about its collection of little statues and figurines: "The oldest representatives of ruling Egyptians . . . show remarkably a definitely central or even north European type . . . Bone carvings of women, made right before the beginning of civilization, show blue eyes. A funerary mask with attributes of the goddess Isis shows a vivid blue-green color of eyes."[58]

    We even have considerable direct evidence in the form of blond and red hair, which has been preserved for thousands of years. Before we examine these in detail, let us first answer a question which is often asked: "Couldn't some chemical action of the soil cause hair to turn blond?" If the desert soil turned hair blond, then how do we account for the blond and red-haired mummies buried in tombs and pyramids which have never touched the soil? And why do we find bodies with black hair, brown hair, blond hair and white hair lying side by side who are buried under the same conditions in the same soil?

    How do we explain the fact that much of the hair has a fine texture and under a microscope has the same appear ance as Nordic hair? How do we explain the fact that many species of animals, including the Egyptian species of cats and bulls, which the Egyptians mummified and buried, have retained their natural hair colors? How do we explain the fact that pigtails of red and black hair wrapped around each other retained their natural hair colors after thousands of years in the Peruvian desert?

    Thor Heyerdahl once asked these questions of W.R. Dawson, the world's foremost expert on mummies, who had spent a lifetime studying tens of thousands of mummies from many parts of the world and had written many books and articles about them. This was his answer: "From the examination of a large number of mummies from both Egypt and other countries including South America, my opinion is that hair does not undergo any marked change post-mortem. The hair of a wavy or curly individual remains curly or wavy, and that of a straight-haired person remains straight.

    "In mummies and desiccated bodies the hair has a tendency to be crisp and brittle, but this is the natural result of a drying-up of the sebaceous glands, which during life, feed fatty matter into the hair follicles which keeps the hair supple and flexible. It seems unlikely to me that any change in color would take place in a body which had never been exposed to light. To sum up then, all the evidence I have indicates that the nature of hair does not alter after death except in becoming dry and brittle."[59]

    Sir Wallis Budge, whose translation of the Egyptian Book of the Dead can still be seen in many bookstores, wrote, "The predynastic Egyptians; that is to say, that stratum of them which was indigenous to North Africa, belonged to a white or light-skinned race with fair hair, who in many particulars resembled the Libyans . . . "[60] Budge had seen many of their unmummified, but well-preserved, bodies which were buried in the bone-dry Egyptian desert, which is remarkable for its preservative qualities.
    The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.[61] A mummy with red hair, red mustache and red beard was found by the pyramids at Saqqara.[62] Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.[63] The book History of Egypt ian Mummies mentions a mum my with reddish-brown hair.[64] The mummies of Rameses II[65] and Prince Yuaa[66] have fine silky yellow hair. The mummy of another pharaoh, Thothmes II, has light chestnut-colored hair.[67]

    An article in a leading British anthropological journal states that many mummies have dark reddish-brown hair.[68] Professor Vacher De Lapouge described a blond mummy found at Al Amrah, which he says has the face and skull measurements of a typical Gaul or Saxon.[69] A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored ones.[70] Chestnut-haired mummies have been found at Silsileh.[71] The mummy of Queen Tiy has "wavy brown hair."[72] Unfortunately, only the mummies of a very few pharaohs have survived to the 20th century, but a large proportion of these are blond.

    The Egyptians have left us many paintings and statues of blondes and redheads. Amenhotep III's tomb painting shows him as having light red hair.[73] Also, his features are quite Euro pean. A farm scene from around 2000 B.C. in the tomb of the nobleman Mek etre shows redheads.[74] An Egyptian scribe named Kay at Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.[75] The tomb of Menna (18th Dynasty) at West Thebes shows blond girls.[76] The god Horus is usually depicted as white. He is very white in the Papyrus Book of the Dead of Lady Cheritwebeshet (21st Dyna sty), found in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. [77]

    A very striking painting of a yellow-haired man hunting from a chariot can be found in the tomb of Userhet, Royal Scribe of Amenophis II.[78] The yellow-haired man is Userhet. The same tomb has paintings of blond soldiers. The tomb of Menna also has a wall painting showing a blond man supervising two dark-haired workers scooping grain.[79]

    The Funerary stele (inscribed stone slab) of Priest Remi clearly shows him as having red hair,[80] although he couldn't have been a priest of Set at such late date. A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called Wedjat Eye.[81] The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue" in Egyptian. A very attractive painting is found on the wall of a private tomb in West Thebes from the 18th Dynasty. The two deceased parents are white people with black hair. Mourning them are two pretty fair-skinned girls with light blond hair and their red-haired older brother.[82]

    Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and blond hair.[83] She was co-ruler with her husband Amenhotep III and it has been said of their rule, "The reign of Amenhotep III was the culminating point in Egyptian history, for never again, in spite of the exalted efforts of the Ramessides, did Egypt occupy so exalted a place among the nations of the world as she had in his time."[84]

    Paintings of people with red hair and blue eyes were found at the tomb of Bagt in Beni Hassan.[85] Many other tombs at Beni Hassan have paintings of individuals with blond and red hair, as well as blue eyes.[86] Paintings of blonds and redheads have been found among the Tombs at Thebes.[87] Blond hair and blue eyes were painted at the tomb of Pharaoh Menphtah in the Valley of the Kings.[88] Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red hair and blue eyes.[89] They are shepherds, workers and bricklayers.
    A blond woman was painted at the tomb of Djeser-ka-re-seneb in Thebes.[90] A model of a ship from about 2500 B.C. is manned by five blond sailors.[91] The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.[92] A painting at the tomb of Meresankh III at Giza, from about 2485 B.C., shows white skin and red hair.[93] Two statues from about 2570 B.C., found in the tombs at Medum, show Prince Rahotep and his wife Nofret. He has light green stones for eyes. She has violet-blue stones.[94] A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking man with blond hair.[95] Grafton Smith mentions the distinctly red hair of the 18th Dynasty mummy Henutmehet.[96]

    Coon tells us that "many of the officials, courtiers, and priests, representing the upper class of Egyptian society but not the royalty, looked strikingly like modern Europeans, especially long-headed ones." (Note: Nordics are long-headed.)[97]

    Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.
    A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published showing paintings, sculptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these,102 appear European, 13 look black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look European.
    The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very European. The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.[98] It was once painted sunburned red.[99] The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper class women as white; this because the men became surnburned or tanned while outside under the burning Egyptian sun. The women, however, usually stayed inside.

    Hopefully, the interested reader will find value in the evidence gathered in this article. The anthropologists and scientific investigators cited here obtained their evidence in a spirit of dedicated professionalism, and without any socio-political motivation one way or another. Their revelations answer, to a very considerable extent, many of the questions and mysteries surrounding mankind's development. v

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    FOOTNOTES

    [1] Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan. 1939, p.98.
    [2] Kink, K.A., Yegipet Do Faraonov. Moscow, Nauka, 1964, p. 27.
    [3] Coon, op. cit., p. 41
    [4] Ibid, p. 294.
    [5] Ibid, pp. 40-44, 467.
    [6] Ibid, p. 124.
    [7] Braidwood, Robert J., Prehistoric Men. Glen view, Illinois, Scott Foresman & Co., 1964, p. 26.
    [8] Phillipson, David W., African Archaeology, N.Y., N.Y., Cambridge University Press, 1985, p. 92.
    [9] Rushton, J. Philippe, Race, Evolution, and Behav ior. New Brunswick, N.J., Transaction Publishers, 1995, p. 131.
    [10] Hoffman, Michael, Egypt Before the Pharaohs. N.Y., N.Y., Barnes & Noble Books, 1993, p. 93.
    [11] Rushton, op. cit., p. 124.
    [12] Ibid, p. 119.
    [13] Id, p. 119.
    [14] Birdsell, Joseph Benjamin, Human Evolution: An Introduction to the New Physical Anthro pol ogy. Chicago, Rand McNally College pub. Co., 1975, p. 334
    [15]a. Pietrement, "Note sur la valeur des renseignements que les anciennes peintures egyptiennes peuvent fournir aux naturalistes aux ethnographes et aux historiens," Bulletin de la Societe d' Anthropologie de Paris, 1883, p. 862.

    b. Precis de l'Histoire d'Egypte Vol. 1. Cairo, L'Imprimerie de l'Institut Francais d'Archiologie Orientale du Caire, 1932. p. 68.
    [16]De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899, p. 862.
    [17] Ibid, p. 185.
    [18] Coon, op. cit., p. 478
    [19] Id, p. 482.
    [20] Cavalli-Sforza, L. Luca; Menozzi, Paolo; and Piazza, Alberto; The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1994, pp. 75,76.
    [21] Coon, op. cit., p. 481.
    [22] Id, Plate 10 caption.
    [23] Id, Plate 30 caption.
    [24] Id, p. 478.
    [25] Id, p. 477.
    [26] Petrie, W.M. Flinders, "The Races of Egypt", Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. XXXI, 1901, p. 252.
    [27] Sperber, Daniel, "The Discovery of a Temple of Meremptah at On," Antiquity, volume 53, 1973, p. 19.
    [28] Maspero, G., History of Egypt. London, The Grolier Society, 1903.
    [29] Lepre, J.P., The Egyptian Pyramids, A Comprehensive, Illustrated Reference. Jefferson, North Carolina, McFarland & Co., 1990.
    [30] Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt. N.Y., N.Y., T. Nelson, 1971, p. 71.
    [31] Romer, John, Ancient Lives, Daily Life in Egypt of the Pharaohs. N.Y., N.Y., Henery Holt & Co., 1984, p. 66.
    [32] Von Lichtenberg, R., "Die arische Buchstabenschreibenentwicklung und ihre fernere Ausdehnung", Mannus, vol. 4, 1912, p. 300.
    [33] Castleden, Rodney, The Stonehenge People, An Exploration of Life In Neolithic
    Britain 4700-2000 BC. N.Y., N.Y., Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987, p. 237.
    [34] Burenhult, Goran, general editor, People of the Stone Age. San Francisco, CA, Harper, 1993, p. 129.
    [35] Id., p. 129 (same page)
    [36] Ivimy, John, The Sphinx and the Megaliths. London, Turnston, 1974, p. 132.
    [37] Ibid, pp. 84-85.
    [38]
    Forde, Daryll, "Early Cultures of Atlantic Eur ope." American Anthropologist Vol. 32, 1950, p.53.
    [39] Ibid, p. 56.
    [40] Id, p. 53.
    [41] Id, p. 56.
    [42] Mackie, Euan, The Megalith Builders. N.Y., N.Y., Dutton, 1977, pp.191-192. p. 41.
    [43] Wheeler, R.E.M., Prehistoric and Roman Wales. London, Oxford University Press, 1925.
    [44]a. Mohen, Jean-Pierre, The World of Megaliths. N.Y., N.Y., Facts on File, 1990, pp. 70-79.

    b. Joussaume, Rober, Dolmens for the Dead. Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press, 1988, p. 129.
    [45] Propylaean Weltgeschichte, 1961.
    [46] Tompkins, Peter, Secrets of the Great Pyramid. N.Y., Harper and Row, 1971, p. 143.
    [47] Coon, op. cit., p. 98.
    [48] Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions. Garden City, Doubleday, 1971, p. 249.
    [49] Id, same page.
    [50] Faidherbe, "Sur les Tombeaux Megalithiques et sur les Blonds de la Libye." Bulletin de la Societe d' Anthropologie de Paris, ca. 1869, p. 532.
    [51] Sayce, A.H., "Anthropological Miscellenia," Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVII, 1888, p.175.
    [52] Coon, op. cit., p. 85.
    [53] a. Hoffman, op. cit., pp. 243-245.

    b. Wernick,Robert, The Monument Builders. N.Y.,Time-Life Books, 1973,pp.69-70.

    c. Joussaume, op. cit. p. 118.
    [54] Naville, Edouard, "The Origin of Egyptian Civilization," Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XXXVII, 1907, p. 205.
    [55] Falkenburger, Frederic, "La Composition Raciale de l' Ancienne Egypt," Anthropologie vol. 51, 1947, p. 242.
    [56] Dart, Raymond A., "Population Fluctuations over 7,000 years in Egypt," Transactions of the Roy al Society of South Africa vol. XXVVII, 1940, p. 95.
    [57]a. Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA., 1992, p. 8.

    b. Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R., Egyptian Mummies. London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924, p. 99.
    [58] A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the British Museum. London, Har rison and Sons, 1930, p. 24. See also 1975 edition.
    [59] Heyerdahl, Thor, American Indians in the Pacific. London, George Allen and Unwin, 1952, p. 323. This book also has colored plates of red-haired mummies from Peru.
    [60] Budge, Vol. I, op. cit., p. 49.
    [61] Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch. N.Y., 1972, p. 68.
    [62] Smith and Dawson, op. cit., pp. 80-81.
    [63] Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petrie's Collection of Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt," Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII, 1889, p. 216.
    [64] Pettigrew, Thomas Joseph, History of Egyptian Mummies. London, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, 1834, P. xvi.
    [65] Smith and Dawson, op. cit., p. 99.
    [66] Id, p.97.
    [67] Budge, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 216.
    [68] Macalister, A., "Notes on Egyptian Mummies," Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XXIII, 1894, p. 120.
    [69] De Lapouge, op. cit., p. 207.
    [70] Ibid, p. 208.
    [71] Id, same page.
    [72] National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its Splendors, 1978, p. 24.
    [73] Ibid, p. 103.
    [74] Claiborne, Robert, The Birth of Writing, N.Y., Time-Life Books, 1974, pp. 98-99.
    [75] Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma, University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p. p. 53.
    [76] Ibid, p. 26.
    [77] Id, p. 107.
    [78] Id, p. 120.
    [79] Id, p. 216.
    [80] Id, p. 247.
    [81] Id, p. 251.
    [82] Id, p. 259.
    [83] Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallée du Nil," Bulletin de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739.
    [84] Budge, op. cit., Vol. IV, p. 183.
    [85] Hamy, E.T., "La Figure Humaine dans l'Ancienne Égypte" Bulletin et Memoires de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris 1907, p. 29.
    [86] Id, same page.
    [87] Groenewegen, H. and Ashmole, Frankfort, Art of the Ancient World. N.Y., Harry N. Abrams, Inc., no date. See color plates.
    [88] Hamy 1907, op. cit., p.33
    [89] Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol. III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932, plate XI.
    [90] Pietrment, op. cit., p. 862.
    [91] Groenewegen, op. cit., Colorplate 2.
    [92] Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne. Marseille, Musée Boreby, 1973, p. 94
    [93] Vandersleyen, Claude, Das Alte Aegypten, Berlin, Propylaean Verlag, 1975, plate XIX.
    [94] Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient Egypt, New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 1968, pp. 34, 35.
    [95] Ibid, p. 65.
    [96] Strouhal, op. cit. p. 88.
    [97] Coon, op. cit., p. 96.
    [98] Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, op. cit., p. 67
    [99] Silverberg, op. cit., p. 168.

  2. #2
    Forumista senior
    Data Registrazione
    31 Mar 2009
    Località
    IPERURANIO INTERIORE
    Messaggi
    4,328
     Likes dati
    63
     Like avuti
    331
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up

    Gli Antichi Egizi appartenevano in origine alla Razza Bianca , come del resto tutti i Nord-Africani , in maggioranza alla sua variante mediterranea/occidentale con una abbastanza forte componente cromagnoide/falica/protonordide.
    Questo é inequivocabile , ed in aggiunta ebbero pure componenti ariane/nordiche propriamente dette grazie alla successiva dominazione di aristocrazie mitanniche e greco-macedoni in epoca storica più tarda.
    Diversi faraoni sia arcaici che posteriori avevano capelli biondi , rossi o biondo-rossicci e fisionomia affine a quella europea , pure con tratti nordidi o simili. Ad es. Ramses II era rosso di capelli , la regina Cleopatra era bionda (la sua dinastia era di origine macedone) , giusto per citarne un paio di casi fra i tanti che poi vi indico in dettaglio con gli articoli a seguire sul tema.
    Basta avere alcune buone conoscenze a livello storico-antropologico per saperlo , l’evidenza stessa ci mostra ancora oggi la presenza delle antiche tracce genetiche e somatiche di questi egizi originari all’interno dell’odierna popolazione egiziana ormai parzialmente ed inevitabilmente mescolata con levantini , orientalidi e negroidi ; nel nord dell’Egitto , fra i copti , permane comunque ancora un ceppo di persone classificabili come bianchi (paleo)europoidi. Purtroppo sono una esigua minoranza a rischio di scomparsa e lo stesso vale anche per tutto il Nord-Africa e Maghreb (Algeria , Marocco e Tunisia) , in cui i bianchi saranno il 10-15% circa della popolazione totale (ma qui la degenerazione iniziò sostanzialmente solo nel primo medioevo con l’invasione arabo-musulmana e l’importazione di schiavi negroidi centro-subsahariani che poi si fusero con gli autoctoni dando vita agli odierni mulatti nord-africani).
    L’avvenuto imbastardimento razziale a causa della mescolanza coi nubiani , già ampiamente iniziato nell’antichità e che si era ormai stabilizzato già in epoca greca e romana (tanto è vero che gli egiziani dell’epoca venivano già descritti più o meno come mulatti) , portò al declino inarrestabile di quella che un tempo era stata la gloriosa civiltà e cultura Egizia.
    Infatti basta vedere la differenza fra l’Antico Egitto e l’Egitto moderno ed attuale : il primo era all’avanguardia in tanti campi e settori dell’umana conoscenza e la sua luce risplendeva ovunque , il secondo è ormai un paese del terzo mondo privo di significativo slancio creativo , seppur in ogni caso messo meglio rispetto alla restante Africa centro-meridionale a prevalenza negroide , per via della componente bianca che tuttora permane.
    C'è seriamente da temere che l'Europa stessa fra pochi decenni faccia la stessa tragica fine dell'Egitto , la storia e lo stesso ciclo degenerativo potrebbero ripetersi facendo sprofondare pure la nostra residua civiltà : per impedirlo bisognerebbe correre subito ai ripari difendendo e magari provando pure a migliorare con adeguate misure eugenetiche la nostra eredità biologica preziosa!

    Vi riporto queste altre considerazioni che tempo fa avevo inviato via-e-mail al un mio caro amico Diego , abbastanza scettico sulla questione , sul tema Antico Egitto Bianco :

    Gli ANTICHI EGIZI che hanno creato una grande cultura erano SI AFRICANI , ma di RAZZA BIANCA!! NON solo NON erano negri , ma neppure mezzi-mulatti come gli arabi di oggi (imbastarditisi coi negri nel corso dei secoli dopo averli conquistati e schiavizzati) : gli egizi era BIANCHI MEDITERRANEI con una aggiunta di PROTO-NORDICI CROMAGNOIDI nella casta faraonica e non solo.
    E disprezzavano i negri istituendo una specie di apartheid per vietarne
    l’accesso in Egitto. Gli Egizi infatti penetrarono in Nubia ed in altre
    zone centro-meridionali dell'Africa abitate da mulatti-negroidi e solo in
    seguito a questi contatti persero le loro caratteristiche originarie
    imbastardendosi. Quando poi i nubiani neri giunsero in Egitto , le
    PIRAMIDI c’erano già da MILLENNI , costruite da bianchi!!
    Tutto il NORD AFRICA , vedi attuale MAGHREB , era abitato da popoli di RAZZA BIANCA prima che giungessero arabi nel medioevo e negri importati come schiavi , ecc.
    Confermo e ribadisco quindi quel che si dovrebbe sapere : i creatori dell’antico Egitto così come i Cartaginesi ed i Libici erano bianchi mediterranei con una aggiunta di proto-nordici cromagnoidi…sono dipinti e descrizioni dell’epoca oltre a reperti archeologici e ricerche antropologiche sul dna a mostrarci che questa è la realtà!! I faraoni mulatti ci furono solo in un’epoca ormai tarda quando la spinta creativa della civiltà egizia si era già esaurita.
    Ancora oggi , seppur la maggior parte di loro è degenerata razzialmente già da tantissimi secoli , si vedono alcuni egizi del nord che sono bianchi eccome. Ti ricordo il fatto che i nord-africani fornirono validi soldati e generali all’Impero romano di cui facevano parte.
    Questi nord-africani erano molto simili ai baschi , ai sardi , agli antichi liguri e alla popolazione pre-indoeuropea dell’Europa meridionale. Il Nord Africa era razzialmente l’estremo prolungamento mediterraneo dell’Europa meridionale , la sua propaggine che costituiva la zona di confine! In tutto il Nord Africa , attuale Maghreb , resta circa un 10% della popolazione di razza bianca (fra Berberi , Riffani marocchini e Cabili algerini si trovano ancora diversi individui biondi dolicocefali) , un tempo maggioritaria e poi mischiatasi purtroppo con altre popolazioni di mulatti-negroidi importati come schiavi soprattutto in seguito alla
    conquista arabo-islamica del primo medioevo ; ecco perché oggi i nord-africani non sono più quelli che erano nell’antichità e fino a
    1300-400 anni fa… è così che crollano le civiltà un tempo fiorenti , seguendo la parabola discendente in base alla legge della mescolanza del sangue ; finché una certa relativa purezza bianca resta viva c’è ancora possibilità di rinascita , ma un eccessivo miscuglio con masse di colore fa decadere in modo pressoché irrimediabile…Cmq ecco prove e documentazioni…
    Ti cito dall’enciclopedia del “Corriere della Sera – Rizzoli Larousse” che
    ho a casa e che conferma il concetto da me espresso prima :
    “Le sole regioni africane che fino al secolo scorso ebbero un’importanza
    storica furono quelle dell’Africa settentrionale , non tanto come elementi
    del mondo africano , isolato dal deserto , quanto come estreme propaggini
    meridionali del mondo mediterraneo. “ P.259
    Sugli antichi EGIZI BIANCHI v. qui un mucchio di cose interessanti :

    http://www.white-history.com/earlson/nordicegypt.htm
    http://www.white-history.com/earlson/rameses.htm
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=1309269&postcount=87
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=1302109&postcount=5
    Arguments proceeding from "One for the Afrocentrists" - Stormfront
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=155717&highlight=arthur+kemp
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/arguments-proceeding-one-afrocentrists-155717p5.html?highlight=arthur+kemp
    http://nerone.freeservers.com/
    Burying the myth of "black Egypt" (image intensive) (1 2 3 4)
    http://www.panaryan.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3997
    http://egyptologist.org/discus/messages/24/5539.html?1067265199
    Vuoi altra documentazione? Eccola qui :
    Articoli sugli Egizi bianchi mediterranei e proto-nordici :
    http://www.egittologia.net/Community/ForumdiEgittologiaeanticoegitto/tabid/74/forumid/36/postid/4315/view/topic/Default.aspx
    http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/nsforum/ns3-30.html
    http://christianparty.net/pharaohs.htm
    Qui in dettaglio su Antichi Egizi dai capelli rossi o biondi :
    http://www.burlingtonnews.net/redhairedmummiesegypt.html
    “The World of the Pharaohs - A Complete guide to Ancient Egypt" di
    Christine Hobson : a pag. 101 mostra le foto delle mummie di Yuya e Thuya
    e dice letteralmente: ""....Yuya master of the King's Chariots and Thuya
    his blond-haired wife , were found in their intact tomb in
    1903.......omissis......Yuya and Thuya were the parents of Queen Tiye, the
    wife of Amenhotep III - and thus the grandparents of Akhenaten and
    great-grandparents of Tutankhamun".
    http://nius.studenti.it/nius/forum/controinformazione/message.php?mess=20300&inth=0
    "BIANCHI e NERI : 101 FATTI e 1 MENZOGNA
    Whites & Blacks 101 FACTS By Rev. White
    Traduzione italiana di Romeo Caudan
    EGITTO
    "Fatto #62: L' antico egitto fu fondato e costruito da caucasici
    mediterranei, circa nel 4500 a.c. Il grande periodo di grandezza
    egiziano fu tra il 3400 ed il 1800 a.c. e fu caratterizzato dalla sua
    stupefacente architettura, le piramidi, i templi, le cui reliquie
    sono ancora evidenti oggi. Gli egiziani bianchi furono pionieri
    nella medicina, nella chimica, nell' astronomia e nella legge,
    padroneggiarono la matematica e l' ingegneria ed In molti campi
    i loro progressi rimangono ineguagliati. (37) (39) (21)
    Fatto #63: Ma, circa verso il 3400 a.c. la civilizzazione inizio' a
    diffondersi lungo il nilo, portandoli in contatto con i nubiani negri
    del sud. Presto questi vennero usati come schiavi e l' Egitto divenne
    la prima "societa' multirazziale" della storia. (39) (10) (14)
    Fatto #64 L' infusione del patrimonio genetico negro inizio'
    dal basso della societa' egiziana.Gli schiavi erano eventualmente
    liberati, ricevevano una eguaglianza politica e prendevano posto
    nelle autorita' al governo. (10) (37)
    Fatto #65: al tempo del re Tut (1370-1352 a.c.) perfino la classe
    dirigente fu imbastardita dai negri, e gli egiziani iniziarono il loro
    percorso verso il basso. Oggi, il non-piu-grande Egitto e' una nazione
    del terzo mondo, avendo perso la sua arte, la sua medicina, la sua
    abilita' architettonica e la sua posizione negli affari nel mondo."


    V. pure ME QUI e seguenti per un analisi panoramica :
    http://forum.giovani.it/amici/56858-io-holux-seguace-dellangelo-luminoso-24.html#post772979
    Gli ANTICHI EGIZI erano BIANCHI , prima di imbastardirsi e decadere , e
    tuttora si vede la differenza fra gli egiziani del nord , più chiari e
    simili agli europei e veri eredi degli Egizi primordiali , di lingua copta
    (pre-araba) e quelli del sud levantinizzati ed in parte negrizzati a
    contatto con i negroidi nubiani.
    Fra l’altro , RICERCHE GENETICHE hanno confermato che alcuni importanti
    faraoni avevano capelli biondo-rossicci ed inoltre l’Egitto fu poi invaso
    e dominato da indoeuropei appartenenti al popolo dei MITANNI. V. qui :
    http://www.white-history.com/earlson/rameses.htm
    http://www.white-history.com/earlson/nordicegypt.htm
    http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/egypt.htm
    http://www.acam.it/memmiera.htm
    http://www.lavocedifiore.org/SPIP/article.php3?id_article=415 CITO :
    “di Aristide Malnati* (www.ilsole24ore.com, 16 febbraio 2006) Uno dei
    misteri sui grandi d’Egitto è ormai sul punto di essere svelato: Zahi
    Hawass, Direttore del Consiglio Supremo delle Antichità in Egitto, ritiene
    di aver identificato la mummia della regina Hatshepsut, verosimilmente la
    prima donna-faraone in riva al Nilo (regnò tra il 1479 e il 1457 a. C.,
    nel corso della XVIII Dinastia). (…) È una mummia di una donna di mezza
    età, dai lunghi capelli rosso-biondi - proprio simili, in base alle fonti,
    alla folta capigliatura della famosa regina.”
    http://digilander.libero.it/marcoguidocorsini/studi2.htm
    Mitanni ed Egitto :
    http://fattori-arcani.blogspot.com/2006_02_12_archive.html
    "Archeomisteri - HYKSOS, OVVERO FENICI, BABILONESI & C." :
    http://www.edicolaweb.net/am_1226.htm
    "La Weltanschauung indoeuropea: un sistema specifico, non una struttura
    universale!"
    http://www.politicaonline.net/forum/showthread.php?p=5807298
    “Il mito dei faraoni negri”
    http://www.politicaonline.net/forum/showthread.php?t=137122
    “faraoni biondi: presenze nordiche nell'antico egitto?”
    http://www.politicaonline.net/forum/showthread.php?t=38111



    Gli antichi egizi erano quindi molto più simili a noi europei che agli egiziani degenerati di oggi...
    Per finire alcuni articoli che riporto qui integralmente :


    http://www.egittologia.net/Community/ForumdiEgittologiaeanticoegitto/tabid/74/forumid/36/postid/4315/view/topic/Default.aspx
    "Citazione: Testo in inglese
    Posto anche la traduzione (fatta da me!)
    Citazione:
    Cronaca – Prova diretta della presenza di Capelli Chiari ed Occhi Azzurri nell’Antico Egitto
    La mummia della moglie del sovrano Tutankhamon ha capelli castano chiari con riflessi ramati. (61) Una mummia con capelli, baffi e barba rossi è stata rinvenuta in una piramide a Saqqara [ho letto da qualche parte che è stata trovata nella piramide di Cheope, è possibile?] (62)
    Mummie dai capelli rossi sono state trovate nelle caverne dei coccodrilli [?] ad Aboufadia (63) Il libro “History of Egiptian Mummies” [“Storia delle Mummie Egizie”] ricorda una mummia con capelli castano-rossicci (64)
    Le mummie di Ramesse II (65) e del principe Yuaa (66) hanno bei capelli biondo chiaro. La mummia di un altro faraone, Tuthmosis II, ha capelli color castano chiaro (67)
    Un articolo apparso su un’importante rivista antropologica inglese afferma che numerose mummie hanno i capelli di colore marrone-rossiccio scuro. (68 ) Il professor Vacher De Lapouge descrive una mummia bionda rinvenuta a Al Amrah, che, secondo lui, avrebbe il viso e le misure del cranio tipiche di un Gallo o di un Sassone (69) Una mummia bionda è stata trovata a Kawamil insieme ad altre con capelli castani (70) Mummie con capelli castani sono state trovate anche a Silsileh (71) La mummia della regina Tiy ha “capelli ondulati e castani” (72) Sfortunatamente, solo le mummie di pochi faraoni sono giunte ben conservate fino al Ventesimo Secolo, e la maggior parte di queste sono bionde. Gli egizi ci hanno lasciato numerose pitture e statue di persone con capelli biondi o rossi.
    Nella tomba di Amenhotep III ci sono raffigurazioni del sovrano con capelli rosso chiaro (73)
    Inoltre, le sue caratteristiche fisiche sono abbastanza “europee”. Una scena rurale del 2000 a. C. nella tomba del nobiluomo Meketre presenta pitture con personaggi dai capelli rossi (74) Uno scriba egizio chiamato Kay, vissuto a Saqqara attorno al 2500 a. C. ha gli occhi azzurri (75)
    Qui c’è una sua raffigurazione:
    http://www.delphi.com/redramesses/messages/?msg=21.1
    La tomba di Menna (18esima dinastia) a Tebe Ovest presenta ragazze bionde (76) Il dio Horus è solitamente dipinto come bianco di pelle. E’ molto chiaro nel Papiro del Libro dei Morti della Dama Ceritwebeshet (21esima dinastia), conservato nel Museo Egizio del Cairo (77).
    Una pittura molto impressionante di un uomo biondo che caccia da un carro si trova nella tomba di Userhet, Scriba Reale di Amenofi II (78 ) L’uomo con i capelli biondi è proprio Userhet. La stessa tomba presenta pitture con soldati a loro volta biondi. La tomba di Menna ha pure raffigurazioni di un uomo biondo che supervisiona due lavoratori con i capelli neri che raccolgono il grano. (79)
    La Stele Funeraria (lastra di pietra incisa) del Sacerdote Remi raffigura chiaramente l’uomo con i capelli rossi, (80) benché non potesse essere un sacerdote di Seth in un periodo così recente. Un ciondolo portafortuna era considerato l’”Occhio di Horus”, l’Occhio Wedjat. (81) L’occhio era sempre blu, e la parola “wedjat” significa “verde” (o blu?) in Egiziano Antico. Una pittura molto suggestiva si trova sulla parete di una tomba privata, a Tebe Ovest, della 18esima dinastia. I due genitori defunti sono persone dalla carnagione bianca e dai capelli neri. Sono rappresentate in lutto due belle ragazze dalla pelle chiara con capelli biondo chiaro e il loro fratello più grande dai capelli rossi. (82).
    La regina Thi è raffigurata con la carnagione rosea, gli occhi azzurri e i capelli biondi. (83) Era la coreggente con il marito Amenhotep III ed è stato detto, su loro regno : “La reggenza di Amenhotep III è stata il punto culminante della storia Egizia e, malgrado l’importante sforzo dei Ramessidi, l’Egitto non avrà mai più un posto di così primaria importanza tra le nazioni del mondo come lo ha avuto in questo periodo”. (84) Amenhotep III sembra un Europeo nelle sue statue. Pitture di persone con capelli rossi e occhi azzurri sono state rinvenute alla tomba di Bagt a Beni Hassan. (85) Molte altre tomba a Beni Hassan presentano raffigurazioni di individui con capelli biondi o rossi, o occhi azzurri. (86) Pitture di biondi o rossi sono state trovate anche nelle tombe a Tebe. (87) Capelli biondi ed occhi azzurri sono stati dipinti anche nella tomba del Faraone Menphtah nella valle dei re. (88 ) Rappresentazioni risalenti alla Terza Dinastia presentano nativi Egiziani con capelli rossi e occhi azzurri. (89) Essi sono pastori, lavoratori e muratori.
    Una donna bionda è stata dipinta nella tomba di Djeser-ka-ra-seneb a Tebe. (90) Un tipo di barca del 2500 a.C. è governata da cinque marinai biondi. (91) Il dio Nuit veniva raffigurato di pelle chiara e biondo. (92) Una pittura presente nella tomba di Meresankh III a Giza, risalente al 2485 a.C., raffigura personaggi dalla pelle chiara e dai capelli rossi.
    (93) Due state del 2570 a.C., rinvenute nelle tombe a Medum, raffigurano il principe Rahotep e sua moglie Nofret. I suoi occhi sono pietre verdi. Quelli della donna sono pietre blu-viola. (94) Una pittura della tomba di Iteti a Saqqara raffigura un uomo dai tratti somatici decisamente nordici e con i capelli biondi. (95) Grafton Smith ricorda il colore chiaramente rosso dei capelli della mummia risalente alla 18esima dinastia di Henutmehet. (96)
    Il professore di Harvard Carleton Coon, nel suo libro “Le Razze d’Europa”, racconta che molti degli ufficiali, dei membri della corte, dei sacerdoti, rappresentanti delle alte classi della società Egizia ma non la regalità, sembravano proprio dei moderni europei, specialmente quelli con un cranio allungato” (Nota: I nordici hanno la testa allungata). (97) Europei dal cranio allungato sono più comuni in Inghilterra, Scandinavia, Olanda e nord della Germania.
    Ripeto: MOLTI DEGLI UFFICIALI, MEMBRI DELLA CORTE, E SACERDOTI, RAPPRESENTANTI DELLE ALTE CLASSI DELLA SOCIETA’ EGIZIANA … SEMBRAVANO PROPRIO DEI MODERNI EUROPEI.
    Nel volume “Ramesse II il Grande” c’è una immagine della mummia bionda di Ramesse II. Un’altra raffigurazione si trova nel libro “X-Raying the Pharaohs”, soprattutto l’immagine sulla copertina. Rappresenta i suoi capelli biondi.
    Il libro intitolato “Chronicle of the Pharaohs” è stato recentemente pubblicato: presenta pitture, sculture e mummie di 189 faraoni e importanti personalità dell’Antico Egitto. Di queste, 102 sembrano europei, 13 Neri, e le restanti sono difficili da classificare. Tutte le nove mummie hanno caratteristiche europee.
    Una recente scoperta di mummie egizie del periodo romano lascia stupiti i ricercatori. Un terzo delle mummie ha i capelli chiari! Perché la maggior parte delle notizie da Zahi Hawass tralasciano questo importante fatto?
    Qui ci sono informazioni:
    http://www.delphi.com/nordichistory/messages/?msg=512.4
    Il primo faraone, Narmer, anche conosciuto col nome di Menes, sembra proprio un Europeo. Lo stesso può dirsi del cugino di Cheope Hemon, che progettò la Grande Piramide di Giza, con l’aiuto di Imhotep. Una ricostruzione al computer del volto della Sfinge presenta tratti facciali chiaramente Europei. (98 ) Essa era inizialmente dipinta di rosso scuro. (99) Gli egizi spesso dipingevano gli uomini di classi sociali più elevate con carnagione rossa e le donne bianca; questo perché gli uomini si abbronzavano sotto al caldissimo sole egiziano.
    Le donne, invece, stavano solitamente dentro casa. "


    http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berberi
    "Per quanto se ne sa, i Berberi sono il popolo indigeno del Nord-Africa. I fossili umani paleolitici affini ai Berberi propriamente detti, sono noti in paleo-antropologia con il nome di uomo di Mechta-Afalou, una variante del paleo-europoide del tipo Cromagnonoide databile circa 20000 a.C..
    Nell'antichità le popolazioni nordafricane erano note sotto varie denominazioni: gli antichi egizi conoscevano i ṯḥnw (nominati dal "Re Scorpione" di età predinastica, intorno al 3000 a.C.), i ṯmḥw, i Rbw (probabilmente da leggere Libu, "Libi"), i mšwš. Capi dei mšwš divennero addirittura faraoni intorno al 1000 a.C. Nello spirito di riscoperta delle proprie tradizioni che anima da alcuni decenni alcuni intellettuali berberi, molti Berberi oggi fanno iniziare il loro calendario dal 950 a.C., approssimativa data di ascesa al trono di Sheshonq I, iniziatore della XXII dinastia, anche se probabilmente era già libica anche la dinastia precedente.
    In epoca successiva, molti nomi di popoli e tribù ci giungono da storici greci e latini, a partire da Erodoto.
    In particolare, si ricordano i Libi nelle regioni più occidentali, i Numidi nella zona dell'attuale Algeria, i Mauri nell'attuale Marocco, mentre nell'interno vi erano soprattutto i Garamanti e i Getuli.
    A partire dal I millennio a.C., il Nordafrica conobbe la colonizzazione di vari popoli. Dapprincipio Fenici e Greci (Cartagine è fondata intorno all'814 a.C., Oea-Tripoli nel VII secolo a.C., Cirene intorno al 630 a.C.). In seguito fu il turno dei Romani, che contesero ai Cartaginesi la supremazia sulla regione.
    Intorno al III secolo a.C. si cominciano ad avere notizie precise su veri e propri Stati berberi, con propri re e una propria organizzazione: i regni di Numidia e di Mauretania. A quest'epoca risalgono alcune figure celebri come Massinissa, Giugurta, Giuba II, ecc.
    Dopo diverse vicende, che li videro sempre meno autonomi, i regni berberi persero definitivamente la loro indipendenza nel 40 d.C., sotto Caligola. Durante la dominazione romana molti Berberi emersero nelle arti, nella politica e nella religione, esprimendosi nella lingua scritta del tempo: il latino. Vi furono così scrittori (da Terenzio a Marziano Capella, con personaggi come Frontone, Apuleio, o Tertulliano), santi cristiani (dai martiri scillitani a San Cipriano, San Vittore, Sant'Agostino e Santa Monica), papi (Vittore I, Melchiade, Gelasio I), e perfino alcuni imperatori (dal libico-punico Settimio Severo, fondatore di una dinastia, al mauro Macrino). (...)
    Gli Amazigh, cioè i Berberi, sono una popolazione europoide dell'Africa del Nord. Sembra che almeno fino all'età del Bronzo (circa 1200 a.C.), tra le popolazioni berbere fosse piuttosto diffusa la depigmentazione, come carattere genetico, documentata anche da pitture rupestri del Tassili e in iscrizioni egiziane (vedi Popoli del Mare). La depigmentazione sopravvive in forma residuale ancora oggi particolarmente tra i berberi dell' Atlante in Marocco che non raramente hanno occhi azzurri e capelli rossicci, come è anche testimoniato dagli Spagnoli per i Guanci delle Canarie.
    Dal momento che al giorno d'oggi è diffusa la concezione che "africano" sia solo chi ha la pelle scura (chi parla Politically correct usa "africano" al posto del termine riprovato "negro"), i Berberi sono erroneamente ritenuti come una popolazione di origine esterna stabilitasi in Nordafrica solo in tempi recenti. E spesso vengono per ciò erroneamente assimilati agli Arabi, che sono penetrati in queste regioni a partire dal 7° secolo.
    In realtà per quanto si risalga indietro nel tempo i Berberi sembrano avere popolato in Nordafrica fin dal Neolitico.
    Questo popolo è entrato nella storia già 5000 anni fa: popolazioni berbere sono infatti citate nei testi egiziani fin dal 3000 a. C.
    La maggior parte della popolazione in Algeria, Marocco e Tunisia è di origine berbera. Ma i Berberi si trovano anche in Libia, Mauritania, Egitto ed alcuni stati dell'Africa occidentale, ma soprattutto nel Niger e in Mali (Tuareg). "


    Evidence for the Ancestors of the Guanches as Founders of Predynastic Egypt.
    http://www.north-of-africa.com/article.php3?id_article=494
    PANF Amazigh - Pan Aryan National front - No Rats! Just Right!-
    www.panf.info/upload/forumdisplay.php?f=56
    Amazigh Roots: Celtic-Amazigh connection?
    www.amazighroots.blogspot.com/2007/05/celtic-amazigh-connection.html
    White Amazigh
    www.whitearyan.info/berbers/




    http://christianparty.net/pharaohs.htm
    http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/nsforum/ns3-30.html
    "Ancient Nordic Egypt by John Paul Jones
    I often travel to Egypt. It provides an excellent holiday for a White nationalist: Beautiful weather, a friendly people with an acute awareness of the Jewish problem, a TV news station broadcasting uncensored news in English and a wealth of history. However, as much as I enjoy Egypt, it is sadly a primitive shadow of its former greatness. The Egyptians have reverted back to a desert economy, dependent on tourism, handouts and revenue from the Suez Canal to support the whole country.
    I am amazed when people claim that the former great Egyptian empire was founded by Blacks. Anyone making such a claim has clearly never been there. Just a walk around the Egyptian museum in Cairo will dispel these myths. (A huge building, if you inspected every artifact on display for 30 seconds it would take you 9 months to see them all!)
    The fact is that the decline of Egypt began when the original Mediterranean and Nordic founders were completely bastardized by racial mixing.
    The period known as the 25th Dynasty (746 - 655 BC) is the final resting place of Egypt in world history. It was at this time that Egypt had become race-mixed from the bottom of its society to the top and the earliest race-mixed pharaohs with Black features appeared.
    The first Egyptian dynasty began in 3100 BC. On display in the British museum in London is a well preserved body that has been nicknamed "ginger" because of its hair color. It was found in a sand burial pit in Egypt and dates back to 3,300 BC. Red hair is a racial trait only found in Nordics. The Nordics had arrived at least 300 hundred years before the first dynasty. They began the farming and cultivation that is always associated with White settlers.
    Egypt is still racially divided today, with the ruling Arabs mainly centered in the north and the primitive Black Nubians in the south. It is not unusual to see a blue-eyed Egyptian, a throw back to Egypt's Nordic roots.
    Menes could be considered as the founding father of Egypt.
    He developed the irrigation system sorely needed in Egypt's arid environment and he built up Memphis, the first great capital uniting early Egypt. The term "man" was almost certainly derived from his name. Menes was White, as the only contemporary depiction of him on the palette of Narmer/Menes shows. (Ref. 1)
    The ridiculous claim that Egypt was founded by Blacks is based on false "revisionism" that dates back to the final, race-mixed pharaohs. Imagine Jesse Jackson becoming President and then depicting Columbus and George Washington as Blacks. Well, that's what happened in the final dynasty of Egypt. Busts of Menes made in that period portray the early Pharaoh Menes with Black features. It is always worth examining the antiquity of an artifact displaying Negroid faces in positions of power. They will always date from the 25th dynasty or later.
    Many mummified bodies are on display at the museum in Cairo. From the first dynasty up until roughly 1050 BC all of the pharaohs were Nordic. Some of the most famous were clearly Nordic: Ramses II had red hair and Queen Hatshepsut had blond hair. A wooden statue of King Hor shows him to have very blue eyes. There are countless examples of Nordic influence in Egypt on display. The ruling elite began to disintegrate when they married outside of their own race. In fact that was the beginning of the end. The term "blue blood" first arose in Egypt. It referred to the fact that their blue veins could be seen through their pale skin.
    The legacy that Tutankhamen left is a clear indicator of the racial pecking order in Egypt at his time. His throne, the ecclesiastical chair has the symbol of nine bows on its foot stool. The nine bows were the traditional enemies of Egypt, epitomized by the crafting of Blacks and Jews chained together. One of his walking sticks has the same image, and his sandals have Blacks and Jews inlaid into the soles so that he could always crush Egypt's enemies under his feet.
    Racial war with the Nubians was a common occurrence in ancient Egypt.
    In 1296 BC the Egyptians conquered Nubia and they built a series of forts along its border to protect against insurrection. The world's first "Whites only" signs appeared along the Nile in hieroglyphics. They still stand today. At one stage it was illegal for any Blacks to enter Egypt.
    The eternal enemy within, the Jew, had long been identified as posing a serious threat. The Egyptians kept them in slavery in an attempt to curtail their pernicious influence. The animosity felt in Egypt toward the Jews predates Islam.
    A further demonstration of the Nordic origins of Egypt can be shown by the pyramids. They were built around 2500 BC. In England, at Silbury hill, Wiltshire, there is a huge burial mound. It is covered in earth but when that earth is removed it reveals an elaborately constructed step pyramid. This dates back to 2660 BC, over one hundred years earlier then the great pyramids of Giza. The step pyramids of central and South America were not built by the Incas or Aztecs. In all of their historical writings they clearly tell of the "great White fathers" who came and gave them civilization and left great constructions behind.
    The decline of Egypt occurred because they failed to protect themselves from interbreeding with Blacks. By making slaves of the Blacks and Semites they allowed them into their society. Inevitably slavery resulted in the mixing of the lower types with the Whites. Within 200 years of the start of this racial mixing Egypt was wiped off the face of the earth as a civilized nation. The start of the 25th dynasty and the beginning of Nubian rule marked the terminal chapter in the history of ancient Egypt.
    Most Americans show considerable surprise at the thought of America becoming a Third World nation. How can such a powerful nation sink into poverty and chaos? Egypt was the greatest superpower in the world at its height. It existed as a great world power for thousands of years. By racially mixing with the Blacks, the White genius, which built the pyramids and irrigated the desert, was extinguished. The well organized, disciplined, brave White army of Egypt was replaced with a multi-racial rabble, which was easily defeated by European armies.
    How will America finally fall apart? We are definitely on the road to becoming a race-mixed society just like Egypt. All taboos against race-mixing have been relentlessly attacked by the Jews and their mass media. The Jews even encourage race-mixing for everyone, but themselves, with movies like "Monsters Ball" with Halle Berry. Naturally America will grow increasingly incompetent and bureaucratic as non-Whites and race-mixed people fill up our nation, but White people alive today will suffer most from taxes that only go up.
    The taxes on White people will become more and more oppressive. White people will become synonymous with "the rich" in Democrat-talk. As long as you have more money than a Mexican, who just crossed the Rio Grande, you will be considered "rich." Meanwhile, an increasing population of Latinos, Blacks and Third World immigrants will demand free health care, schools and endless government services at our expense. Eventually the Democrats will raise taxes so high that White people will lose their homes. These homes will quickly be confiscated by the state, and people like Tom Daschle and Hillary Clinton will pick out a large Cambodian family that "deserves" to be awarded what used to be your family home. Naturally the new residents of your home will be exempted from paying the excessive taxes that drove you and your family out. How much longer will intelligent, productive Whites stay in America once the Democrats make the tax system that oppressive? America could easily fall apart much, much faster than Egypt. The pathetic remains of Egyptian civilization should serve as a stark warning against race-mixing.
    The White faces of the early pharaohs, who built the world's first great civilization, can be contrasted with the dark faces of the racial mongrels, who occupy the ruins of Egypt thousands of years later. Egypt was the world's greatest superpower for a much longer period of time than the United States has held that title. Our civilization will be just as thoroughly destroyed if we repeat the racial mistakes of the ancient Egyptians. "


    http://www.libreopinion.com/members/standarteslc/race02.html
    " The Importance of Race in History
    History itself may very well be considered the greatest evidence as to the inherent differences between the races in the capability of forming and/or maintaining civilizations. Just as we measure a student's performance in school on what grades he or she receives, we can also measure the performance of the human races on what they have accomplished throughout history. While most people are aware of the White origins of the ancient Roman, Greek, and Sumerian civilizations, fewer are aware of the White origins of the ancient Egyptian, Central American, Indian, Chinese, and Japanese civilizations. In essence, upon examining these civilizations, we can find not only that they were indeed created by White people, but that their decline and fall can be attributed to the fact that the creators of them intermarried with non-whites with the resulting offspring unable to maintain what their ancestors had created. Though we lack the space to cover this massive topic as thoroughly as it can and has been covered in other sources, I hope that the information which is provided below (from the book, White America) will enable you to understand that Race has played a crucial role in history, a role which our people would be wise to recognize lest we should continue our current path of "colorblindness", a path which can only result in the destruction of the civilization our forefathers created for us. Written records cover but a short last chapter in human history. To grasp the results of contact by races, it is necessary to push back the curtain of history and trace earlier events. Prehistoric migrations of the Whites since the dawn of time carried with them the germs of intellect and culture which would later develop. When races are in permanent contact, there is racial intermarriage creating a mongrel race. However, the language, carvings, statues, and monuments remain to prove that members of the White race once built the civilization. Members of the White race have always been in motion, being away from Europe almost as much as they have been there. Civilization dawned along the Nile and Euphrates. Early White people ventured out to Greece, Rome, and Carthage. To the East they travelled to India and on to Asia. These race movements can easily be followed by skeletal remains, skull formations, implements, burial mounds, etc. A sign of the ancient White man was his burial cell and block (which led to todays vault and tombstone). J. McMillan Brown calls them: "A Caucasian track across the earth." Renown British ethnologist Prof. A.H. Keane wrote: "These neo-lithic monuments, all of the stone cell and block types are found in Asia, Iran, Syria, Palestine, Arabia, Northern Africa, Ethiopia, the Crimea, the British Isles, and China." This megalithic engineering is not found among the yellow or black races.

    White Egypt
    Sir Harry Johnston, the foremost authority on Egypt, in his book, History of Egypt, says that Egypt was a White nation. Early Egyptians recognized that inter-breeding with the Negroes to the south in Nubia would dilute their race. Through race-mixing, the decay would eventually destroy their civilization. Besides the massive evidence that exists otherwise, the idea that the Egyptian civilization was founded or ruled by Blacks is easily dismissed by the simple fact that the Egyptians named the land to the south of them (after they had conquered Nubia), "Sudan," which means "land of the Blacks." If the Egyptians were Black themselves, it would make little sense to classify the land to the south of them as "land of the Blacks." Egypt was divided into two nations--Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt. The first Pharoah, Menes, ruled in the year 3400 B.C. Menes conquered the Black Nubians and built a great dam to divert the waters of the Nile. Thus they were able to drain the swamps and build a vast farming community in the fertile land. Under Menses, hieroglyphic writing (the first alphabetic signs) were developed. It would be 2,500 years later before any other people thought up an alphabet. Egyptian mummies have been exhumed which are complete with hair, eyes, and skin which are strictly from the White race. The great engineering skills which resulted in the construction of the huge pyramids declined as interbreeding between the races spread. By breeding downward their culture gradually disappeared. It was a slow retrogression of both mind and body. Under the Pharaoh Namar, the first huge stone temples were erected using 120,000 Black Nubians as slave laborers. The following six dynasties (years 2,929 B.C. to 2,475 B.C.) saw the development of a formal religion, an orderly government, society, industry, and art. All would be superior to that which would follow them. The Egyptians were the first to discover the use of metals as tools. Thus the drill was developed which would cut slabs of stone blocks twenty to thirty feet long weighing fifty to sixty tons. They had drills of copper, long copper saws, which brought forth mighty weapons. Pyramids were built that would be very difficult to build today. The Great Pyramid was built of two million three hundred thousand stone blocks each weighing two and a half tons. They were floated on rafts from quarries south of Cairo and raised on enormous ramps. This single project took ten years to complete. The Great Pyramid is 481 feet high and the blocks are so close that the edges are fitted one ten thousandth of an inch together which is equal to optical work today. The Sixth Dynasty began the use of Black troops recruited in Nubia against their enemies. This had much to do with the final decay and collapse of Egypt. By the year 1,500 B.C., half of the people of Southern Egypt were of mixed blood. Some 800 years later, all progress ended when Teharka became the first mulatto Pharaoh in 688 B.C. Blacks came to Egypt as soliders, slaves, and captives from other nations. They lived in squalid settlements along the Nile outside the White communities. Certain Pharaohs sought to prevent the mongrelization of the Egyptian race and made it a death penalty to bring Blacks north. One fort was erected on the Nile in central Egypt to stop the passage of Blacks to the north. However, important people were always able to circumvent the law and their slaves were permitted to pass. This is similar to what happened in this country, where even though interracial marriage was against the law in the majority of states until the late sixties, racial intermarriage still occurred both during and after slavery was abolished. The White Egyptian race is now extinct. The later mulatto Pharaohs also wanted to be buried in pyramids but could not figure out how to build them. Thus they removed the name of an early Pharaoh and inserted their own and were buried under the old pyramid. Art, science, and literature died out. White India The ancient Aryans came from Persia and entered India by way of Afghanistan (where their White descendants can still be found). To the south, they conquered and enslaved a dark aboriginal race. These people can be traced to the Asiatic branch of the Black race. Historian Madison Grant found that the Aryanized Whites of India spoke a language directly traceable to the old Sanskrit of the Mediterranean White people. The great Aryan civilization of India existed from 2,000 B.C. to 1,400 B.C. Their writings reveal a vigorous White society, a conquering people, well organized, respecting their women and already in possession of ancient laws. They glorified in agriculture, were passionately religious, and imposed their faith and culture on the surrounding colored population whom they referred to with contempt. They called themselves "a people of fair complexion." Besides complexion, a high bridged nose elevated a person over dark people who have a round-wide nose. Even today, the "nasal index" influences the status of Indians in the caste system. The Aryans set up the caste system to prevent racial intermarriage and they established the Hindu religion which promoted the ideal of maintaining racial purity. The caste system of segregation helped to prolong the Aryan civilization, but eventually, mongrelization set in. The big question was--how to preserve the White race and still utilize the inferior colored peoples? They decided that the answer was: "caste, enforced by law and religion." Originally, caste divided the people into five divisions--warriors, priests, farmers, merchants, and laborers. The first was made up of the purest of the Aryans and the last of the subjected mixbreeds. People were required to marry within their own caste. The very black lowest race was not even allowed to enter the system and were called "outcasts." They were considered barely human. This is how the term "outcast" originated. Caste prevented mixed marriages but was incapable of preventing illegitimate sexual unions. The Aryans were intent on retaining the purity of their White race, but were unable to discover those engaging in sexual relations with the "low caste coloreds." Thus, they turned their wrath on the "half-castes" (half-breeds). They were not allowed to live within the confines of cities. Under certain conditions, soldiers were permitted to slay them without mercy. With time, the mixed breeds multiplied and the caste system broke down. Today, less than 10% of the Indian people can be classified as "White." Nevertheless, these Whites still make up the ruling class.
    Whites In Asia
    Professor Keane wrote: "The dominant position in society seems destined into the future to be held by the large and much convoluted brain of the White Caucasian people." A branch of the White race followed a Northern route into Northern China, Mongolia, Korea, and to Japan. It is admitted that some people living there today are partly White. Furthermore, the early Chinese civilization has been linked to that existing in Babylonia (a White civilization) in prior centuries. The people of southern China and Indochina are a much darker race than the "Whiter" Asiatics to the north. The Japanese are of part White ancestry. Even to this day, the White "Ainus" people live in the mountains of northern Japan and are definitely White people. They are also found on the northern Japanese island of Yezo. The Chinese have the ability to hold on to science but not to advance it (which the Japanese--a more Whiter race--are efficient at). The Chinese suffer from arrest of mental development (further development of the brain) by the closure of the sutures of the skull (like the Blacks) at an earlier age than do the Europeans or Japanese. The Races of Man, by Deniker, page 363, states: "Southern Siberia and North Mongolia are covered with stone circles, barrows, burial places, skulls, iron and copper, which are of European origin." Early Chinese records refer to blond tribes and there remain fair-skinned blue-eyed people in Manchuria and Korea today. The rulers of China for the most part have been of hybrid-White descent. The Chinese civilization was more creative 2,500 years ago than it is today--especially in the southern provinces. Madison Grant, in his widely acclaimed book, The Passing of the Great Race, wrote: "The Chinese seem to be almost as incapable of progress as the Negroes themselves. The only essential difference being that the arrest of mental development comes later in life for the yellow man than for the black."
    Whites in South America
    Prominent ethnologists are confident that the White race is responsible for the cultures of Mexico and Peru. The American Indian came from Mongolia in Asia. They ventured here from Siberia to Alaska and down into Central and South America. Did the White follow the Mongolian on the same route to America? We also know that the Vikings came from Greenland and Iceland to settle in western Canada and the New England states. The White race built an early civilization in the Americas. By the time the Spaniards arrived, their society was already crumbling. The White aristocratic leadership exhibited very different racial features than do the Mongolian Indian population which make up the vast majority of the people living in Mexico today. They built mighty pyramids like those in Egypt and originally had a religion similar to that of the Whites in India. In fact, there is substantial evidence that Egyptians themselves sailed in reed boats across the Atlantic and settled in Mexico. This would explain for example how it is that the Castillo pyramid on Mexico's Yucatan peninsula is an exact duplicate of those found in Egypt. Thor Heyerdahl indeed built a replica of an Egyptian papyrus-reed boat and sailed it safely from Egypt to Mexico to show how the White Mayans arrived. These pyramid builders did not have the slanted eyes of the Indian nor the short round nose-the art that these builders created demonstrates this full well. For example, the sculptures which have been found all reveal a people with a high-bridged nose, thin lips, and often times beards-all characteristics which Indians do not share. There is no doubt that these people intermarried with the Indian people, which, like Egypt and India, caused the downfall of their civilization. The American Indians The mysterious American "Indian" mounds were not built by the present day Mongolian Indians. The White pioneers asked the Indians about the pyramid type mounds. They did not know how they were constructed or for what purpose. We now know that a mixed people from Mexico journeyed up the Mississippi and spread east building the pyramid mounds as grave sites (like in Egypt) and as defensive fortifications for their rulers.
    Why America Is More Advanced Than Mexico and South America
    Far more slaves were brought to South America than to the U.S. The Blacks and Indians freely co-mingled with many of the original Spanish and the Portugese. Thus there was interbreeding on a massive scale. This is why a continent, far richer in natural resources, lags far behind the U.S. in progress. Garcia Calderon, a Peruvian diplomat in his book, Latin America, wrote: "The Negro is a formal influence in Latin America. They are revenged for their enslavement in that their blood is mingled with that of their masters. South American civilization is dependent upon the numerical predominance of the Spaniard over the mulatto, the Negro, and the Indian." As mentioned earlier, when the White and non-white intermix, the result will be offspring of with higher intelligence than the non-white parent, but intelligence lower than the White parent. Thus, the offspring are unable to continue the accomplishments of their White ancestors. This explains why America, with fewer natural resources than Mexico and South America, is so grossly superior in standard of living, culture, technology, etc.-not only do White people form a majority of America's population, but much less racial intermixing has taken place. In addition, it cannot be said that the deciding factor has been our Constitution and democratic ideals, since both Mexico and most of the Central and South American countries have Constitutions and democratic ideals quite similar to ours. "

    The Facts Of Race: Dr William Shockley
    http://southafricasucks.blogspot.com...-shockley.html
    “(…) The white man, especially the Nordic, has been the driving force in civilizing the globe, from the days of earliest antiquity down to the present. In South America, when Cortez arrived, he found a civilization in decay, practising massive levels of human sacrifice, embroiled in civil wars, many cities deserted, others decaying. Most of the great buildings were old. And the natives worshipped him as a god, because he looked just like how their history said the great culture-bearing gods looked - White, Aryan, Nordic! These culture-bearing gods had given them architecture, religion, agriculture, artwork, mathematics. They had either been driven out by jealous natives, or had merged with the native population. Progress halted, then went backwards, and the lower races waited for the whites to come back and save them.
    IN THE EAST
    The same legends survive in China. The founders of China were light-haired, bearded, and grey-eyed. Not Chinese! Burials have been found in Northern China and Siberia of these people. Not only white, but Nordic. As they died out, interbreeding with the Chinese, Chinese culture stagnated, then degenerated, and the world’s greatest empire became a colony of their neighbours - Indians, Japanese, Mongols, later the European powers.
    Japan has a large Aryan element in their population; indeed the southern islands of Japan were mostly white only a few hundred years ago. Perhaps this explains why the Japanese are undoubtedly the most intelligent and civilized of the Asian peoples? India’s Hindu empires were the results of conquest by Aryan invaders, and all Middle Eastern civilizations were Aryan, including Egypt, despite claims that the Pharaohs were black. The only blacks building pyramids were thousands of toiling slaves who interbred with the white Egyptians, eventually destroying that civilization as they did with Rome, Persia, and most other ancient empires.
    THE LESSON
    The White Race is the standard bearer of civilization. Without us, the world will decay and collapse. With us, all races have a secure future. These facts of life, which are the facts of race, must be learnt by us all before it is too late. A polluted race can never be reborn. We must fight, and we must win, regardless of odds, because if we don’t we will die, and there is no doubt of this at all. “


    http://www.savitridevi.org/nubia.html
    "The Egyptian Conquest of Nubia by Savitri Devi Edited by R.G. Fowler

    The following brief article (1,005 words) appeared in the January-February 1979 issue of White Power (page 11). At first reading, it struck me as unworthy of Savitri Devi. It is surely the least significant of her works. It is a brief historical vignette, padded out with long quotations and offering scarcely any analysis. Furthermore, the assertions that ancient Egypt was an “Aryan” nation and that an Egyptian Pharaoh had “fine, Nordic features” struck me as suspicious, because they are errors that Savitri Devi never would have made. The Ancient Egyptians were a Mediterranean Caucasoid people. They were not Aryans, and although they did have fine features, they were not Nordic. The origins of this article were clarified by Martin Kerr, the then editor of White Power, who sent me a photocopy of the original manuscript of the essay, which, along with an accompanying letter, I have transcribed here.



    The letter makes it clear that Savitri herself did not think much of her efforts and explains why, under the circumstances, that she could not do better:
    I hope I didn’t bore you with my “bit of ancient history.”



    I was too crushed by the awful heat of Delhi’s summer (it is summer, here, since March) to go to the length of writing something of my own inspiration for White Power. I am not of those privileged ones who have air-conditioning in their lodgings. I have merely a fan above my bed, in my one room and kitchen tiny flat. And that fan—under which I am lying, whenever I am not forced to get up, either to go and get food for my cats, or to go and teach my few private pupils: earn my living and that of my animals, home ones and strays who depend on me—that fan, I say, does nothing more than agitate burning air (45 degrees centigrade in my room, under the fan, a few days back: hardly less than outdoors in the shade). Now you can imagine the furnace in the sun! And when one goes out on foot, be it to walk to the station where one can hire some conveyance, you can imagine what it feels like. I am exhausted when I come home from my lessons or from shopping, and the only thing I am fit for is to call back into my mind the little I once learnt about ancient times.
    [. . .]
    Excuse me if for just now I do not write any more. I intend to write about my late husband—Sri A.K. Mukherji—for the National Socialist World. He deserved it. But I must wait till I can be myself again—after this heat. End of June, beginning of July, the “monsoon rains” are expected. Hurray! That means on the first day a sudden fall in temperature of 25 degrees (centigrade) and a downpour, amidst thunder and lightning. Lovely!
    Apparently Savitri had volunteered to contribute to White Power, but the enervating heat of the New Delhi summer had robbed her of the creativity and concentration necessary for writing anything original, so she dashed off a few lines about 12th dynasty Egypt and Nubia.

    The manuscript is also revealing. First, it makes clear just how much Savitri was suffering from the heat, for she did not even finish the Nubia article, but broke off in mid-thought and, in effect, turned the text into a personal letter. Second, it is clear that the last few paragraphs of “The Egyptian Conquest of Nubia” as published in White Power—including the mistaken racial descriptions of the Ancient Egyptians—were written by another hand. According to Martin Kerr, he was their author. I have indicated these additions in bold below. The title, illustrations, and captions were also provided by Kerr.
    According to Kerr, the additions were not shown to Savitri before the article was published, but he was confident that they would meet her approval, and if they did not, he would have published her corrections in a subsequent issue. Savitri never complained.
    It should be noted that the additions to Savitri’s text, aside from the minor errors of racial anthropology, are quite intelligent. They draw an edifying lesson for the present day from an otherwise abortive historical vignette.
    —R. G. Fowler


    “This is the Southern Frontier. . . No Negro is permitted to pass this boundary northwards, either by foot or by boat . . .”
    Which awful racist wrote these words? Shocking they sound! The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith should look into the matter, surely.
    It is too late, however, for the Jews to punish this author. These words were written—cut into hard stone—over 4,000 years ago.
    The ADL, or any equivalent of it, was not yet invented, and any attempt to bring the spirit of such a body into action would have been met with universal contempt on the part of the people and with the severest penalties on the part of the authorities in power.
    The quoted words are part of the inscription which can be seen to this day upon the boundary stone set up by the order of Pharaoh Senusret III (the fifth king of the Twelfth Egyptian dynasty) at Semneh, one of the two fortresses he had built upon the hills on each side of the Nile, some 30 miles above the second cataract.
    The fortresses were built after his first military expedition into Nubia (the Sudan of today) in the eighth year of his reign. The expeditions of Senusret III followed those of his predecessors. Already under Senusret the First—three generations before—the region of the third cataract was Egyptian and ruled by Hapzefa of Siut, who was buried at Kerma under a mound, with his slaves slain all around him.
    The main motive of the Twelfth dynasty pharaohs in conquering Nubia was their desire to control the Nile more effectively and to be able to foresee more accurately the probable height of the yearly inundation on which the prosperity of Egypt depended. The regulation of the great river was looked upon as the highest duty of the Egyptian ruler—which is true even today.
    In addition to this, there was also the desire to acquire the gold with which the Wadi Alaki and other areas of the Nubian desert valley were full.
    The military expeditions into this region brought the ancient Egyptians—a proud Aryan people—into close contact with the primitive Blacks who inhabited the area.
    The remainder of Senusret III’s inscription at Semneh is interesting: “No boat of the Negroes is to be allowed to pass northward forever . . .”




    And a few years later:
    Year 16, third month of Peret, His Majesty fixed the frontier of the South at Heh . . . I advanced up-river beyond my forefathers; I added much thereto. What lay in my heart was brought to pass by my hand.


    I am vigorous in seizing, powerful in succeeding, never resting; one in whose heart there is a word which is unknown to the weak; one who arises against mercy; never showing clemency to the enemy who attacks him, but attacking he who attacks him. For to take no notice of a violent attack is to strengthen the heart of the enemy.
    Cowardice is vile. He is a coward who is vanquished on his own frontier, since the Negro will fall prostrate at a word: answer him and he retreats! If one is vigorous with him, he turns his back, even when on the way to attack.
    Behold! These people (the Negroes) have nothing frightening about them; they are feeble and insignificant; they have buttocks for hearts! I have seen it, even I, the majesty, it is no lie!
    I have seized their women; I have carried off their folk; I have marched to their wells; I took their cattle; I destroyed their cornseed, I set fire to it. By my life and my father’s, I speak the truth!
    Every son of mine who shall have preserved this frontier which My Majesty has made, is indeed my son and born of My Majesty, verily a son who avenges his father and preserves the boundary of him who begat him. But he who shall have abandoned it, he who shall not have fought for it, behold, he is no son of mine he is none born of me.
    Behold! My Majesty has set up an image of My Majesty upon this frontier, which My Majesty has made, not from the desire that ye should worship it, but from the desire that ye should fight for it!
    In the days this was hewn out of the granite by the scribes of Senusret III, Egypt was a mighty Aryan nation, a military power to be reckoned with, a centre of learning and culture.
    Today, Egypt is no longer a world power, nor is it an Aryan nation. It is impoverished, and populated by mongrels and half-castes. It was vanquished by the very people it had enslaved centuries earlier—a people which is not known for its heroism and warlike spirit: the Jews. How far the civilisation of our ancestors has fallen!
    Without realising it, Senusret III himself tells us how this came to be: “. . . I have seized their women; I have carried off their folk . . .”




    And thus the stage was set for race-mixing which inevitably leads to the destruction of the greatness which lies in the purity of Aryan blood.
    “Cowardice is vile.” “(The Negro) is . . . insignificant.” “. . . for to take no notice of a violent attack is to strengthen the heart of the enemy.” “My Majesty has made (this boundary), not from the desire that ye should worship it, but from the desire that ye should fight for it!”





    This inscription of Senusret III contains much wisdom for 20th century Americans—if they choose to heed it Nothing, however, is more important than the unintentional lesson he teaches us concerning the pollution of the blood. Another great Aryan leader, who, unlike Senusret III, was conscious of this, has expressed it better than anyone:
    “Blood sin and desecration of the race are the original sin in this world and the end of a humanity which surrenders to it.”







    In 1902, E. A. Wallis Budge, the renowned Egyptologist, described the pre-dynastic Egyptians thus:
    "The predynastic Egyptians, that is to say, that stratum of them which was indigenous to North Africa, belonged to a white or light-skinned race with fair hair, who in many particulars resembled the Libyans, who in later historical times lived very near the western bank of the Nile." [E. A. W. Budge, Egypt in the Neolithic and Archaic Periods (London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trübner, 1902), p. 49.]
    Later, in the same book, Budge referred to a pre-dynastic statuette that: "has eyes inlaid with lapis-lazuli, by which we are probably intended to understand that the woman here represented had blue eyes." [Ibid., p. 51.]



    In 1925, the Oxford don L. H. Dudley Buxton, wrote the following concerning ancient Egyptian crania:
    "Among the ancient crania from the Thebaid in the collection in the Department of Human Anatomy in Oxford, there are specimens which must unhesitatingly be considered to be those of Nordic type. If this is so, it would seem that they probably entered Egypt with the other alien elements which began to filter in from Asia in early dynastic times. How far the Nordics ever formed any appreciable element in the population is doubtful, but these specimens prove their existence." [L. H. D. Buxton, The Peoples of Asia (London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trübner, 1925), p. 50.]


    Harry R. Hall, the Keeper of Egyptian Antiquities at the British Museum in the 1920s, had this to say about the invaders who formed the early dynastic Egyptian type:
    "The oldest representations of ruling Egyptians, who may be presumed to belong to this race, shew remarkably a definitely central or even north European type, and it is very probable that this invading people belonged to an early folk-wandering from the 'Nordic' regions that made its way south through Syria, after possibly a period of settlement there." [H. R. Hall, A General Introductory Guide to the Egyptian Collections in the British Museum (London: Harrison & Sons, 1930), p. 24.]


    Later in the same work, he refers to the "northern invaders," who formed an "aristocracy of northern (and possibly Nordic) origin," over the native Egyptians. [Ibid., p. 25.]
    The American physical anthropologist J. Lawrence Angel, studied a series of Egyptian crania dating from the predynastic period, down to the time of the Ptolemies. He concluded that during the invasion of Egypt by the Hyksos (15th Dynasty), Lower Egypt was settled by large numbers of individuals who were "Nordic-Iranian" in type. [J. L. Angel, "Biological Relations of Egyptian and Eastern Mediterranean Populations during Pre-dynastic and Dynastic Times." Journal of Human Evolution I (1972) pp. 307-313.]





    The Scottish physical anthropologist Robert Gayre has written, that in his considered opinion:
    "Ancient Egypt, for instance, was essentially a penetration of Caucasoid racial elements into Africa . . . This civilisation grew out of the settlement of Mediterraneans, Armenoids, even Nordics, and Atlantics in North Africa . . ." [R. Gayre of Gayre, Miscellaneous Racial Studies, 1943-1972 (Edinburgh: Armorial, 1972), p. 85.]
    When English archaeologist Howard Carter excavated the tomb of Tutankhamen in 1922, he discovered in the Treasury a small wooden sarcophagus. Within it lay a memento of Tutankhamen's beloved grandmother, Queen Tiye: "a curl of her auburn hair." [C. Desroches-Noblecourt, Tutankhamen: Life and Death of a Pharaoh (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972), p. 65.]
    Queen Tiye (18th Dynasty), was the daughter of Thuya, a Priestess of the God Amun. Thuya's mummy, which was found in 1905, has long, red-blonde hair. Examinations of Tiye's mummy proved that she bore a striking resemblance to her mother. [B. Adams, Egyptian Mummies (Aylesbury: Shire Publications, 1988), p. 39.]
    The French Egyptologist Christiane Desroches-Noblecourt, has this to say about the famous Egyptian beauty, Queen Nefertiti: ". . . her beauty was of the noble Theban type seen in the necropolis paintings . . ." She goes on to state that ". . . the coloured bust now in Berlin shows the rosy tint of her complexion, which suggests that she was careful to avoid sunlight or, alternatively, that she was of northern stock." [Desroches-Noblecourt, op. cit., p. 90.]
    A painting of the mother of Pharaoh Amenhotep IV (18th Dynasty), reveals that she had blonde hair, blue eyes and a rosy complexion. [W. Sieglin, Die blonden Haare der indogermanischen Völker des Altertums (Munich: J. F. Lehmanns Verlag, 1935), p. 132.]
    Princess Ranofri, a daughter of Pharaoh Tuthmosis III (18th Dynasty), is depicted as a blonde in a wall painting that was recorded in the 19th century, by the Italian Egyptologist Ippolito Rosellini. [Ibid., p. 132.]
    In 1929 archaeologists discovered the mummy of fifty year-old Queen Meryet-Amun (another daughter of Tuthmosis III); the mummy has wavy, light-brown hair. [R. B. Partridge, Faces of Pharaohs (London: Rubicon Press, 1994), p. 91.]



    American Egyptologist Donald P. Ryan excavated tomb KV 60, in the Valley of the Kings, during the course of 1989. Inside, he found the mummy of a royal female, which he believes to be the long-lost remains of the great Queen Hatshepsut (18th Dynasty). Ryan describes the mummy as follows:
    "The mummy was mostly unwrapped and on its back. Strands of reddish-blond hair lay on the floor beneath the bald head." [Ibid., p. 87.]


    Manetho, a Graeco-Egyptian priest who flourished in the 3rd century BC, wrote in his Egyptian History, that the last ruler of the 6th Dynasty was a woman by the name of Queen Nitocris. He has this to say about her:
    "There was a queen Nitocris, braver than all the men of her time, the most beautiful of all the women, blonde-haired with rosy cheeks. By her, it is said, the third pyramid was reared, with the aspect of a mountain." [W. G. Waddell, Manetho (London: William Heinemann, 1980), p. 57.]
    According to the Graeco-Roman authors Pliny the Elder, Strabo and Diodorus Siculus, the Third Pyramid was built by a woman named Rhodopis. When translated from the original Greek, her name means "rosy-cheeked". [G. A. Wainwright, The Sky-Religion in Egypt (Cambridge: University Press, 1938), p. 42.]
    We may also note that a tomb painting recorded by the German Egyptologist C. R. Lepsius in the 1840s, depicts a blonde woman by the name of Hetepheres (circa 5th Dynasty). The German scholar Alexander Scharff, observed that she was described as being a Priestess of the Goddess Neith, a deity who was sacred to the blond-haired Libyans of the Delta region. He goes on to state that her name is precisely the same as that of Queen Hetepheres II, who is also shown as fair-haired, in a painting on the wall of Queen Meresankh III's tomb. He deduced from all of this, that the two women may well have been related, and he suggested that Egypt during the Age of the Pyramids, was dominated by an elite of blonde women. [A. Scharff, "Ein Beitrag zur Chronologie der 4. ägyptischen Dynastie." Orientalistische Literaturzeitung XXXI (1928) pp. 73-81.]
    The twentieth prayer of the 141st chapter of the ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead, is dedicated "to the Goddess greatly beloved, with red hair." [E. A. W. Budge, The Book of the Dead (London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trübner, 1901), p. 430.] In the tomb of Pharaoh Merenptah (19th Dynasty), there are depictions of red-haired goddesses. [N. Reeves & R. H. Wilkinson, The Complete Valley of the Kings (London: Thames & Hudson, 1997), p. 149.]
    In the Book of the Dead, the eyes of the god Horus are described as "shining," or "brilliant," whilst another passage refers more explicitly to "Horus of the blue eyes". [Budge, op. cit., pp. 421 & 602.] The rubric to the 140th chapter of said book, states that the amulet known as the "Eye of Horus," (used to ward-off the "Evil Eye"), must always be made from lapis-lazuli, a mineral which is blue in colour. [Ibid., p. 427.] It should be noted that the Goddess Wadjet, who symbolised the Divine Eye of Horus, was represented by a snake (a hooded cobra to be precise), and her name, when translated from the original Egyptian, means "blue-green". [A. F. Alford, The Phoenix Solution (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1998), pp. 266-268.] Interestingly, the ancient Scandanavians claimed that anyone who was blue-eyed (and therefore possessed the power of the Evil Eye), had "a snake in the eye," and blue eyes were frequently compared to the eyes of a serpent. [F. B. Gummere, Germanic Origins (London: David Nutt, 1892), pp. 58, 62.]
    In the ancient Pyramid Texts, the Gods are said to have blue and green eyes. [Alford, op. cit., p. 232.] The Graeco-Roman author Diodorus Siculus (I, 12), says that the Egyptians thought the goddess Neith had blue eyes. [C. H. Oldfather, Diodorus of Sicily (London: William Heinemann, 1968), p. 45.]
    A text from the mammisi of Isis at Denderah, declares that the goddess was given birth to in the form of a "ruddy woman". [J. G. Griffiths, De Iside et Osiride (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1970), p. 451.] Finally, the Greek author Plutarch, in the 22nd chapter of his De Iside et Osiride, states that the Egyptians thought Horus to be fair-skinned, and the god Seth to be of a ruddy complexion. [Ibid., p. 151.]
    Back to Karl Earlson's Home Page "

    History of the White Race : A Page on Egypt
    http://www.white-history.com/egypt.htm
    Chapter 8. Egypt - Nordic Desert Empire
    The Fall of White Egypt
    http://www.white-history.com/hwr8d.htm
    Chapter 8: Part Two : Egyptian Religion, Mummies, Racial Types and the Middle Kingdom
    Chapter 8: Part Three : Racial Imagery in Tutankhamen's Tomb
    Chapter 8: Part Four: Racial Images in Egyptian Art
    Chapter 8: Part Five: The Nubians and the Fall of White Egypt
    http://www.arthurkemp.com/?cat=6
    http://www.arthurkemp.com/


    YouTube - March of the Titans: A History of the White Race



    YouTube - WHITE CAUCASOID EGYPT




    Ecco la verità storico-antropologica…Spero siano dati più che sufficienti per farvi capire chi erano davvero gli antichi Egizi , gente di nobile sangue membri della nostra magnifica razza Bianca...
    14/88 - Holuxar
    http://www.politicaonline.net/forum/showthread.php?p=8122952#post8122952

  3. #3
    Socialcapitalista
    Data Registrazione
    01 Sep 2002
    Località
    -L'Italia non è un paese povero è un povero paese(C.de Gaulle)
    Messaggi
    89,492
     Likes dati
    7,261
     Like avuti
    6,458
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    30 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    Citazione Originariamente Scritto da Holuxar Visualizza Messaggio
    Quando poi i nubiani neri giunsero in Egitto , le
    PIRAMIDI c’erano già da MILLENNI , costruite da bianchi!!
    Mah, anche la sfinge ha tratti negroidi, sebbene il tipo negro odierno sia piuttosto recente,

    Dei Cro-magnon sappiamo poco, e non erano certo nordici.

    Gli antichi egizi erano di ceppo mediterraneo ibridatosi da sempre, via Nilo, con le popolazione africane subsahariane prenegroidi.
    Addio Tomàs
    siamo fatti della stessa materia di cui sono fatti i 5 stelle

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Data Registrazione
    13 Apr 2005
    Messaggi
    3,002
     Likes dati
    0
     Like avuti
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    Esatto! E' inutile parlare de "gli antichi Egizi", come se fossero un'entità razzialmente monolitica.
    C'era l'élite faraonica, quella degli scribi, i lavoratori, i soldati, gli schiavi, i mercanti stranieri, ecc., che si caratterizzavano probabilmente per una diversa genetica predominante, e ognuna delle quali a sua volta inglobava filoni 'razziali' diversi (preesistenti, immigrati, ecc.).

  5. #5
    email non funzionante
    Data Registrazione
    16 Nov 2007
    Messaggi
    377
     Likes dati
    0
     Like avuti
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    ma che state dicendo??? non l'avrebbero mai accettato superstiziosi com'erano

  6. #6
    Forumista senior
    Data Registrazione
    31 Mar 2009
    Località
    IPERURANIO INTERIORE
    Messaggi
    4,328
     Likes dati
    63
     Like avuti
    331
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up

    Continuo con ulteriori conferme a quanto ho esposto e riportato sopra.
    Sicuramente é esatto affermare che gli antichi egizi non erano un blocco razzialmente compatto e che vi erano varie influenze , oggi ancora più varie , ma la base della popolazione e tanto più le sue élites dominanti erano indubbiamente bianche. Certo é evidente di che tipo prevalente fossero , dato che Egiziani negri veri e propri o mulatti non li vedi neppure oggi , siccome pur nel miscuglio una certa base degli Egizi originari resta tuttora.
    Negare ciò significa negare l'evidenza.
    Gli antichi egizi erano di ceppo mediterraneo misto a cromagnoide , gli influssi sia negroidi che nordici/indoeuropei propriamente detti vennero dopo. La loro stessa cultura era affine a quelle dell’Europa pre-indoeuropea , della Sumeria , dell’Iran elamita e dell’India pre-ariana di Harappa e Moenjo Daro : quindi quella prodotta dal tipo bianco mediterraneo dolicocefalo , di corporatura piccola e snella e dai capelli bruni. Ad esso si aggiungeva appunto la componente cromagnoide documentata e su cui ritorno in dettaglio a seguire. Di negri e nordici non c’era traccia , giunsero entrambi dopo. I primi come sudditi o lavoratori salariati , i secondi irruppero come conquistatori incarnanti aristocrazie guerriere formatori di ceti regali e dominanti. L’ibridazione con le popolazione africane subsahariane avvenne molto dopo la nascita e lo sviluppo dell’età aurea dell’Egitto ; i contatti con la Nubia sono certamente successivi e coinvolsero più che altro la parte Sud dell’Egitto che era geograficamente confinante. Va considerato il fatto storico che gli egizi esprimevano un chiaro disprezzo per i nubiani , li discriminavano , quindi di certo non potevano essere negri come del resto mostra l’evidenza archeologica ed antropologica.
    Gli antichi Egizi consideravano i negri nubiani come una massa di selvaggi e schiavi e nient’altro , praticavano una sorta di apartheid ante-litteram. Alcuni articoli da me riportati lo spiegano in dettaglio.

    I Cro-Magnon , da un punto di vista dell’antropologia fisica , vanno classificati come tipi falici ; non erano nordici ma paleoeuropei pre-ariani , comunque con alcune caratteristiche proto-nordidi evidenziate nei Berberi del Nord-Africa , nei Guanci delle Canarie ed altri popoli affini.
    Il tipo nordico vero e proprio é visibile invece nell’uomo di Aurignac
    (con la sua figura longilinea , snella ed i suoi lineamenti delicati e nobili) , sempre in Francia , come pure nei Kurgan di cui parlava la Gimbutas e che vanno considerati dei proto-indoeuropei a tutti gli effetti. Secondo Kosinna il nordico nacque da una sorta di fusione eugenetica fra Cromagnon ed Aurignac.
    I Cro-Magnon erano diffusi sia in Europa che in Nord-Africa ed in Medio-Oriente all’alba dei tempi ed emigrarono espandendosi anche altrove , dato che le tracce della loro presenza si sono trovate fino in Cina , Oceania , Africa subsahariana e perfino nell’ America precolombiana.
    Ne esistevano un po’ di di vari tipi , ma in genere erano di alta statura con struttura fisica massiccia , con cranio dolicocefalo o brachicefalo , zigomi abbastanza sporgenti, pelle , capelli ed occhi solitamente chiari.
    LADISLAO MILTNER in "STORIA DELLA LETTERATURA TEDESCA" vol.1 faceva , all’inizio in una trentina di pagine circa , considerazioni storiche , biologiche e culturali decisamente importanti sui Cromagnoidi ed i Falici
    dell’Europa e della Germania pre-germanica...I Germani storici stessi furono un incrocio fra indogermani nordici e
    falici cromagnoidi , variante pesante e massiccia del un tipo nordide propriamente detto. Le ho lette tempo fa , però non ho il libro. Culturalmente erano abbastanza incompatibili , pare avessero una sorta di matriarcato , anche se diverso da quello mediterraneo , mentre gli ariani indoeuropei erano ovunque fortemente patriarcali. Tipi falici esistevano
    anche nella Scandinavia prima delle invasioni germaniche. Lo stesso mito dei giganti , presente in varie culture europee e non solo , probabilmente alludeva ai falici cromagnoidi che erano di statura molto alta e corporatura impressionante anche agli occhi degli stessi nordici. Forse quel mito allude all’incontro-scontro fra falici autoctoni e nordici conquistatori. Come spiegava ad es. Adriano Romualdi in “Gli Indoeuropei” , la razza falica è stata definita così da H.F.K. Guenther dato che aveva identificato una sua particolare presenza concentrata nella Westfalia (da cui west-falica) e nella Germania nord-occidentale.
    Invece Paudler e Kern l’avevano definita dalica dalla regione svedese di Dalarne. Ma in definitiva tale tipologia era presente pressoché ovunque nell’antichità , essendosi espansa anche fuori dal continente europeo , con alcune variazioni locali. Cmq sui Cromagnon e gli "Dei Bianchi" in Sudamerica leggi me qui :
    Apocalypto - Pagina 6 - Politica OnLine Forum
    http://www.politicaonline.net/forum/showpost.php?p=5146633&postcount=109
    Anche gli antichi Egizi dovevano avere una forte impronta cromagnoide...
    Oggi però questo tipo è raro da vedere e trovare in Nord Africa e anche nella stessa Europa , si è quasi del tutto estinto tranne che in certe zone dell’Austria , della Germania e della Scandinavia dove comunque è
    mischiato con altri tipi.
    Il Cromagnon era come detto un tipo molto alto e robusto , più del nordico , però era forse un po' disarmonico nei lineamenti volto ; in ogni caso nulla di simile al neanderthal , il cromagnoide si che é stato il prototipo del cacciatore primordiale e dell'Uomo bianco europeo!
    Sui Cro-magnon si possono trovare informazioni interessanti anche in questi testi vari che consiglio di leggere :

    R. Biasutti , Razze e popoli della Terra, Torino, 1967 (4 voll.).
    Federico Prati-Silvano Lorenzoni-Flavio Grisolia, I Fondamenti dell'Etnonazionalismo Völkisch, Effepi Edizioni, 2006.
    Charpentier Louis , Il mistero basco. Alle origini della civiltà occidentale , L’Età dell’Aquario , 2007.


    http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromagnon
    L'Uomo europeo non è venuto dall'africa e discende dal cro-magnon ...
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/luomo-europeo-non-venuto-dallafrica-430356.html
    La preistoria d'Europa e il mito di Atlantide - Politica On The Net
    http://www.politicaonthe.net/forum/etnonazionalismo-voelkisch/2962-la-preistoria-deuropa-e-il-mito-di-atlantide.html
    http://www.thule-italia.org/Marco71/Canarie/Canarie.html
    “In effetti i Guanchi erano stati un popolo misterioso: isolati da tempo
    immemorabile nelle loro Isole, sono stati considerati gli ultimi eredi
    "puri" dell'Uomo di Cro-Magnon, con una somiglianzà fisica paragonabile,
    come è stato accertato anche recentemente, agli antichi popoli Berberi, ai
    Baschi, e ai pre-egizi. Di alta statura, con gli occhi chiari ed i capelli
    biondo-rossi, erano un popolo orgoglioso che seguiva le regole del
    matriarcato: avevano infatti una Regina.”

    Torniamo agli egizi…
    Leggersi questa valida analisi dello stimabile forumista e moderatore
    Felix (che saluto approfittandone per esprimergli la mia ammirazione!) :

    Le facce dei nostri avi che plasmarono l'Europa - Pagina 2 ...
    http://www.politicaonline.net/forum/showthread.php?t=37753&page=2
    “L’errore é l'equazione africa=negri. La razza negra non è l'unica
    esclusiva abitante del continente: ci sono i mediterranei atlantici e
    berberoidi ("libici") della Numidia, Mauritania, Africa Minor, Sahara,
    Cirenaica ed Egitto. E poi ci sono gli etiopici (razza metamorfica
    prodotto di antichi incroci negro-europoidi) e i più antichi abitanti
    dell'africa in assoluto, i khoisanidi. Se andiamo indietro nel tempo (1000
    a.C. circa) osserviamo un'estensione dei negroidi molto minore
    dell'attuale. L'africa orientale ci apparirebbe allora basicamente
    dominata da genti khoisanoidi o etiopoidi, e il Sahara avrebbe meno sangue
    negroide di oggi (fu la schiavitù a introdurre questi elementi, in epoca
    islamica).
    L'equazione suddetta e la soprendente indignazione di molti per l'ipotesi
    antropogenetica "out of Africa" è solo indizio di scarsa informazione,
    ignoranza e cecità ideologica.
    Cfr. anche il 3D "faraoni biondi" nel forum di storia.
    Secondo il testo del Biasutti (che lessi non so quante volte ai tempi
    dell'adolescenza), il nordafrica è sede della razza "Libica", che sarebbe
    una variante occidentale della razza iraniana, con pigmentazione
    leggermente più scura. Il tipo libico è diffuso dal marocco all'Egitto,
    trovandosi nella forma più pura tra i berberi sahariani e i tuaregh.
    Al tipo libico si deve la forte macroschelia dei nordafricani (tipo
    estremamente longilineo, asciutto e di alta statura) e l'accentuata
    dolicocefalia (indici 73-76).
    Ma alla base libica si aggiunge una notevole componente mediterranea, in
    varie forme: atlanto-mediterranea, mediterranea classica, litoranea, che
    non si discostano, tranne la prima, dalle nostre della sponda europea.
    Inoltre ci sono alcune componenti nordiche (specie nel Rif e nella
    Cabilia), originate da antiche migrazioni dal nord, ultima delle quali
    quella nota dei Vandali (V sec. d.C.), e dall'immigrazione europea
    medievale (rinnegati e schiavi).
    Le invasioni arabe hanno portato anche tipi iranoidi arabici.
    Questo per le razze del gruppo europide. Ci sono però anche altri elementi
    non-europidi infiltrati o residuali. I negri, arrivati con la schiavitù in
    epoca islamica, hanno introdotto tipi mulattoidi nelle città e in certe
    oasi, e formano le caste basse dei Tuaregh e berberi sahariani. Questi
    ibridi si riconoscono immediatamente per l'indice nasale alto (naso
    depresso, a narici allargate), per la forma del capello e per il colore
    più scuro. Ma non costituiscono un elemento fondamentale se non i poche
    aree. I berberi dell'atlante sono del tutto esenti da contaminazioni
    negroidi.
    In forme sporadiche e residuali si trovano anche elementi khoisanidi
    nell'egitto (un esempio noto: Sadat) e cromagnonoidi (l'antico tipo dei
    canari, sparso anche nella zona marocchina, caratterizzato da estrema
    robusticità ossea).
    La linea divisoria tra stirpi europidi e stirpi negridi passa vicino al
    limite sud del sahara, alcuni chilometri a nord del fiume Senegal, poi
    continua verso occidente attraversando l'ansa del Niger -la cui valle è
    negroide- e vira poi verso nord, dove le tribù Tebu portano i tipi
    negroidi nel Sahara orientale sino ai confini libici. Il limite si
    mantiene spostato verso nord all'entrare in territorio egiziano, e
    attraversa il Nilo all'altezza di Assuan.
    vedi anche il 3D "faraoni biondi" sul forum di Storia.” - Felix


    ACAM - Civiltà Enigmatiche - Le mummie di Ra
    http://www.acam.it/memmiera.htm
    “I faraoni biondi
    Il parallelismo tra Egitto e America trova ulteriori conferme nella scoperta
    citata da Murry Hope nel suo libro "Il Segreto di Sirio" (Corbaccio 1997).
    Alle analisi, le mummie regali della XVIII dinastia presenterebbero gruppo
    sanguigno A. Considerando che il gruppo sanguigno più diffuso in Egitto era,
    ed è ancora oggi, il gruppo 0, la cosa è alquanto insolita. La stranezza
    aumenta se consideriamo che il gruppo A di solito si accompagna al tipo
    dalla pelle chiara e gli occhi azzurri o comunque caucasico. Cosa ci
    facevano individui dall'aspetto nordico tra i faraoni dell'Egitto del Nuovo
    regno? In più alcune mummie inca, conservate al British Museum di Londra
    hanno dato i medesimi risultati (gruppo A e aspetto caucasico) del tutto
    estranei alle popolazioni pre-ispaniche del Nuovo Continente. Individui
    biondi dalla pelle chiara tra le caste dominanti dell'Egitto e d'America. Il professor W.C. Emery, autore di Archaic Egypt è convinto che si tratti di un popolo venuto dall'esterno, non indigeno, tenutosi a distanza dalla gente comune, unitosi solo con le classi aristocratiche. Una maggiore conoscenza del DNA dei faraoni e dei suoi legami con questo popolo potrebbe provenire
    da un'identificazione genetica delle mummie disponibili (ne riparleremo.
    Inoltre mummie bionde e dai tratti caucasici sono state ritrovate anche in
    Cina (nel prossimo numero un dossier fotografico). Sembra che in epoca
    antica, una popolazione di questo tipo abbia stabilito colonie in tutto il
    globo, mantenendo piuttosto circoscritta la sua mescolanza genetica. Chi
    erano questi popoli biondi del tutto estranei alle etnie locali? Che legame
    avevano con gli Shemsu Hor, i semidei Seguaci di Horus e i biondi Viracocha
    delle mitologie americane?”


    "Omero e l’origine dell’umanità
    http://www.terraincognitaweb.com/sito/archivio/03/intervistavinci.pdf.
    http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:kxfZiWo8pv8J:www.terraincognitaweb. com/sito/archivio/03/intervistavinci.pdf+Egitto+nordico+Vinci+Nilsson&h l=it&ct=clnk&cd=11&gl=it
    “Popoli del Mare che attaccarono l’Egitto attorno al XII o XIII secolo
    a.C. Secondo Spanuth questi Popoli senza nome sarebbero venuti dal nord Europa. In particolare da Heligoland. “


    I “Popoli del Mare” ed i libici che avevano tentato di invadere il Delta del Nilo verso il 1200 a.C. erano infatti in parte indoeuropei. Come scrisse J. Vercoutter ne L’Antico Egitto (Garzanti, Milano 1960, p. 84) :
    “Tribù ariane si erano sparse in tutta l’Europa meridionale e traversando il mare erano venute a occupare la Libia. Subito cominciarono a cercare di infiltrarsi in Egitto”.


    Altre prove e testimonianze scritte e visive le trovate qui :


    l'ancien Égypte - Marhba Forum Tunisie Chat Tunisien
    http://www.marhba.com/forums/travers-monde-90/lancien-gypte-27791.html
    Blond Haired Blue Eyed Gods - Stormfront White Nationalist Community
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/blond-haired-blue-eyed-gods-253634.html

    The Ancient Egypt Race Issue: Comprehensive refutation of Afrocentrist claims to Egyptian civilization.
    King Tut Reconstruction: Forensic evidence showing that King Tutankhamun was Caucasoid.
    North Africans: Genetic data showing the peoples of North Africa to be predominantly Caucasoid.


    Egyptians and Nubians
    http://racialreality.110mb.com/egypt_nubia.html
    Ethiopians
    http://racialreality.110mb.com/ethiopians.html
    Non Egyptian North Africans
    http://racialreality.110mb.com/north_africans.html

    Civilized Men in Egypt
    http://www.snpa.nordish.net/chapter-IV4.htm
    Da Carleton Stevens Coon , The Races of Europe
    Il libro è disponibile on-line qui :
    http://www.snpa.nordish.net/racesofeurope.htm

    The Ancient Egyptians. - Stormfront White Nationalist Community
    www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/ancient-egyptians-497756.html

    Egizi bianchi: evidenze scientifiche ed archeologiche
    http://www.krol.it/forum/egizi-bianchi-evidenze-scientifiche-ed-t6885.html
    http://www.krol.it/forum/egizi-bianchi-evidenze-scientifiche-ed-t6888.html?



    “Take Your Choice Separation or Mongrelization By Theodore G. Bilbo”
    http://www.anointedembassies.com/studies/TYC/tyc-02.html
    Egypt
    The early Egyptians were a Caucasian people, and they were the first
    conveyors of the arts of civilization to the Negroes of Africa. A survey
    of Egyptian civilization will show that the period of greatness was in the
    earlier centuries, and after a prolonged period of decline, this ancient
    civilization was not overthrown; it decayed.
    Egyptian history covered by the reign of the Pharoahs has been divided
    into thirty dynasties or family reigns. Culture in this kingdom had
    already progressed far when the first Pharoah, Menes, came into power. He
    is said to have ruled over a people with a well established background of
    tradition and attainment, able to divert the waters of the Nile, to
    reclaim the swamp lands of the Delta, and to wage warfare against the
    Negroid peoples of Nubia.
    The period of Egyptian history known as the Old Kingdom and including the
    Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Dynasties was from 2928-I475 B.C. This was
    the period of Egyptian greatness and in religion, government, society,
    industry, and art, Egypt was a well-constituted nation. The Egyptians made
    considerable progress in astronomy; they studied medicine, surgery, and
    chemistry; they were a religious people, believing in the resurrection of
    the body after death and in the immortality of the soul.
    But perhaps it was in the use of metal tools that the people of Egypt
    found their lasting claim to greatness. With these instruments placed in
    skilled hands and with the desire to build imperishable monuments to their
    power, the Egyptians entered what we have later referred to as the age of
    the mighty pyramids. These people were architects and engineers, and great
    pyramids have stood for centuries as conspicuous evidence of the ability
    of the Caucasian civilizers of Egypt.
    The great civilization of Egypt was produced by a people who showed no
    evidence of Negro blood, and a form of caste served for awhile to prevent
    intermarriage with the colored races. It is only natural that we find the
    first traces of Negro blood in Southern Egypt where the people were
    nearest to the Negro tribes of Africa. Negroes gradually filtered into
    Egypt, and the waging of war against the African tribes served to
    intensify racial contact. As racial contact continued, Egyptian history
    records what has certainly been proved to be the result of long continued
    contact - blood admixture.
    The large number of black women found in the harems of the rich, and even
    in the huts of the common people, quickly impaired the purity of the race,
    even among the upper classes of the nation, and the types began to
    resemble that of the Negro tribes of Equatorial Africa. The language fared
    no better in the face of this invasion, and the written characters soon
    became as corrupt as the language. The taste for art decayed; technical
    ability began to deteriorate. The moral and intellectual standards
    declined and the mass of the people showed signs of relapsing into
    barbarism.
    The type of the Egyptian showed certain evidence of Negro blood by 1500
    B.C. although it is impossible to estimate just to what extent the blood
    of the African had mixed with that of the white civilizers of Egypt at
    this date. We do know that the Egyptians continued to go into the South
    and that Negroes continued to come into Egypt as soldiers, slaves, and
    workers. The Africans not only went to Egypt, but they remained to mix
    their blood with that of the proud Egyptian and to mongrelize his race.
    As mongrelization continued, the civilization of Egypt became stagnant and
    finally decayed. Art, science, and literature were dead, and nothing
    remained of Egyptian greatness when a mulatto inherited the throne of the
    Pharoahs in the Twenty-fifth Dynasty (663-525 B.C.). This mongrel prince,
    Taharka, ruled over a Negroid people whose religion had fallen from an
    ethical test for the life after death to a form of animal worship.
    The degeneration of the Egyptian religion gives a picture of the degraded
    state of mind of the Egyptian mongrel. The early religion of the Egyptians
    was a monotheism. Their writings speak of one god, the creator of heaven
    and earth. The local divinities were mere personifications of the
    attributes of God. The papyrus of Ptah-hotep, composed under Dynasty V,
    speaks of God, showing that the writer had the idea of one god. What did
    this religion become in time? Julius Africanus tells us that, in the reign
    of Kaiechos, it was established that the bull and the goat were gods.
    Later the Egyptians became infatuated and worshipped the cat, the bug, and
    eventually vegetables.
    Juvenal writes (Satura XV): 'Who knows not the sort of monsters Egypt in
    her infatuation worships? One part venerates the crocodile, another
    trembles before an ibis gorged with serpents. The image of a sacred monkey
    glitters in gold, where the magic chords sound from Memnon broken in half,
    and ancient Thebes, with her hundred gates, lies buried in ruins. In one
    place they venerate sea fish, in another river fish, there a whole town
    worships a dog; no one Diana. It is an impious act to violate or break
    with the teeth a leek or an onion. O holy nation! whose gods grow for them
    in the gardens. Every table abstains from animals that have wool. It is a
    crime there to kill a kid, but human flesh is lawful food. Were Ulysses to
    relate this at supper to the amazed Alcinous, he would perhaps excite the
    ridicule or anger of some as a lying babbler. Does he suppose the heads of
    the Phaeacians so void of brain.' What deterioration! What degeneration!
    What perversion! A faith in accord with the vitiated
    Pan-Hamitic-Semitic-Greek-Egyptian Negro blood. The mongrel was worthless,
    and he has remained so ever since. The story of Egypt-the unsurpassed
    greatness of the Old Kingdom, the three thousand years of progress, the
    height of power as typified by the Great Pyramid, the decline and decay of
    this civilization down to the day when a mulatto sat on the throne of the
    Pharoahs and ruled a Negroid people, the three thousand years of
    stagnation - should be sufficient warning to white America! Prolonged
    racial contact will inevitably result in mongrelization; the process may
    be slow, but the result is just as certain as the rising of tomorrow's
    sun.”

    White America --by E.S. Cox
    http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/cox/wa-04.html

    Debunking_Afro-centrist_lies_about_Nefertiti.doc
    Egyptian_Genetic_Profile.doc
    Egypt_Nordic_Desert_Empire.doc
    Early_White_Colonies_-_Race_War_in_China_and_Japan.doc
    http://www.solargeneral.com/library/


    Ancient White Egypt
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gisXsucDkKQ

    White Egypt (1 of 2)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eb6vc5zYysc

    White Egypt on Black Nubians
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn6iDMY6vtA


    L'EVIDENZA , mostrata anche dai video in modo limpido ed inequivocabile , parla chiaro!
    Onore ai grandi Antichi Egizi Bianchi!
    WP! - Holuxar
    http://www.politicaonline.net/forum/showthread.php?p=8151401#post8151401

  7. #7
    31°
    Data Registrazione
    10 Sep 2003
    Località
    romagna
    Messaggi
    1,107
     Likes dati
    0
     Like avuti
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    ma come DNA, non è possibile vedere a chi assomigliano gli antichi egizi?

    comunque sono stato in egitto: non ce ne è uno uguale all'altro.
    alcuni sembrano più nordici del siciliano medio, altri sono "sudanesi" quindi molto "neri".

    ho notato la stessa cosa per i marocchini.

    il colore chiaro dei capelli non deriva dall'età della mummia e dal tipo di conservazione?

    non vorrei che questa discussione sfociasse nelle cazzate nazistoidi che si trovano in rete.....sennò parliamo di cerchi nel grano.

  8. #8
    Socialcapitalista
    Data Registrazione
    01 Sep 2002
    Località
    -L'Italia non è un paese povero è un povero paese(C.de Gaulle)
    Messaggi
    89,492
     Likes dati
    7,261
     Like avuti
    6,458
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    30 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    Citazione Originariamente Scritto da Holuxar Visualizza Messaggio
    I Cro-Magnon erano diffusi sia in Europa che in Nord-Africa ed in Medio-Oriente all’alba dei tempi ed emigrarono espandendosi anche altrove , dato che le tracce della loro presenza si sono trovate fino in Cina , Oceania , Africa subsahariana e perfino nell’ America precolombiana.
    Ma questo cosa vorrebbe dire??
    i cro-magnon sono semplicemente homo sapiens che arrivarono in europa 40.000 anni fa, probabilmente da più direzioni dato che la diaspora africana data a 80.000 anni fa, quindi non i cro-magno si sparsero dappertutto, ma cro-magnon è il tipo sapiens trovato in europa, e ben più tardi che altrove, essendo stata l'india raggiunta oltre 70.000 anni fa.
    si era sempre spostato in climi caldi e doveva essere quindi più scuro dei neanderthal, evolutisi nella fredda europa.
    il tipo nordico, qualora indoeuropeo dovette differenziarsi non più di 6/7000 anni fa, come i negroidi del resto.

    E quando mai si sarebbero avute influenze di un tipo appena nato? gli antichi egizi sono di tipo mediterraneo con influenze esclusivamente sud-africane
    Addio Tomàs
    siamo fatti della stessa materia di cui sono fatti i 5 stelle

  9. #9
    Socialcapitalista
    Data Registrazione
    01 Sep 2002
    Località
    -L'Italia non è un paese povero è un povero paese(C.de Gaulle)
    Messaggi
    89,492
     Likes dati
    7,261
     Like avuti
    6,458
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    30 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    Ne esistevano un po’ di di vari tipi , ma in genere erano di alta statura con struttura fisica massiccia , con cranio dolicocefalo o brachicefalo , zigomi abbastanza sporgenti, pelle , capelli ed occhi solitamente chiari.
    40.000 anni fa non esistevano tipi chiari, essendo calde tutte le zone raggiunte.

    il tipo 'chiaro' è con tutta probabilità recentissimo come una variante indoeuropea POSTERIORE al ceppo originario

    l'alta statura infine si trova in africa fin da 1.800.000 anni fa, "Turkana boy" , un erectus(ergaster) potenzialmente alto più di 1,80
    Addio Tomàs
    siamo fatti della stessa materia di cui sono fatti i 5 stelle

  10. #10
    31°
    Data Registrazione
    10 Sep 2003
    Località
    romagna
    Messaggi
    1,107
     Likes dati
    0
     Like avuti
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    come si fa a stabilire che i "cro magnon" fossero di carnagione chiara, biondi e con occhi azzurri?

    magari anche i neanderthal lo erano.

    comunque sono passati un po' di giorni e nessuno ha risposto alle mie domande.
    mi sento sinceramente ignorante in antropologia, e non mi sono chiari i metodi che stabiliscono se un morto di 4000 anni fa sia europeo, mediorientale, asiatico o africano nero.
    leggendo i primi essaggi mi sembrava un discorso puramente razzista, ma posso sbagliarmi. ho letto di "aspetto nobile" riguardo agli egizi, quindi sicuramente "bianchi" (perchè è di questo che si parla, mi sembra di aver capito che si voglia attribuire ai "bianchi" la nascita della civiltà, negando agli altri popoli, soprattutto ai neri, le capacità di organizzarsi o di formare uno stato).

    se volete datemi delle risposte

 

 
Pagina 1 di 2 12 UltimaUltima

Discussioni Simili

  1. Gli Dei dell'Antico Egitto
    Di Ottobre Nero nel forum Esoterismo e Tradizione
    Risposte: 7
    Ultimo Messaggio: 04-10-23, 16:47
  2. IL CORPUS ERMETICO GRECO DELL’ANTICO EGITTO ROMANO
    Di zucchetta nel forum Esoterismo e Tradizione
    Risposte: 1
    Ultimo Messaggio: 20-08-12, 23:55
  3. Risposte: 55
    Ultimo Messaggio: 11-11-08, 15:59
  4. Dee e maghe nell’Abruzzo antico.
    Di Eymerich (POL) nel forum Paganesimo e Politeismo
    Risposte: 0
    Ultimo Messaggio: 03-03-06, 03:46
  5. Risposte: 1
    Ultimo Messaggio: 16-05-03, 15:46

Permessi di Scrittura

  • Tu non puoi inviare nuove discussioni
  • Tu non puoi inviare risposte
  • Tu non puoi inviare allegati
  • Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
  •  
[Rilevato AdBlock]

Per accedere ai contenuti di questo Forum con AdBlock attivato
devi registrarti gratuitamente ed eseguire il login al Forum.

Per registrarti, disattiva temporaneamente l'AdBlock e dopo aver
fatto il login potrai riattivarlo senza problemi.

Se non ti interessa registrarti, puoi sempre accedere ai contenuti disattivando AdBlock per questo sito